Beginning June 01 2001
Messages: 1049
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

Aaron Dewell

• 06/20/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  

Adam McKenna

• 06/04/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  

Adam Rothschild

• 06/27/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/24/01 Re: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 Re: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/03/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  

Albert Meyer

• 06/19/01 Re: [OT] Lucent max tnt config
  
• 06/18/01 Re: opinions on routers/switches for par
  
• 06/12/01 Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
  
• 06/05/01 Re: Rooted boxen and the law
  
• 06/02/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  

alex

• 06/13/01 1220 L collo space
  
• 06/10/01 router failutes inside PacBell
  

Alex Bligh

• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/07/01 Re: HTML-format postings (Re: NANOG Dige
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 06/29/01 Re: Nasdaq Breaks Down for 2nd Day, Disr
  
• 06/28/01 Re: East Coast Outages?
  
• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 RE: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/14/01 Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
  
• 06/07/01 Sprint NAP
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/01/01 mac-address accounting
  

Alexei Roudnev

• 06/23/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/23/01 Few questions to the american ISPs [Re:
  
• 06/05/01 Re: Rooted boxen and the law
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile = Lame
  

Andrew Barros

• 06/14/01 Re: Opinions about InterNAP
  
• 06/13/01 Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
  

Andrew C. Ohnstad

• 06/06/01 Re: C&W Perring
  

Andrew Odlyzko

• 06/04/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  

Andy Bradford

• 06/24/01 Re: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/20/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  
• 06/07/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  

Andy Dills

• 06/06/01 C&W Explination (fwd)
  

Andy Ellifson

• 06/23/01 Qwest.Net / US West.Net
  

ARIN IN-ADDR Role

• 06/29/01 IN-ADDR.ARPA Progress Report
  

Arnold Nipper

• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again!
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again!
  

Ask Bjoern Hansen

• 06/19/01 Re: OT: No More Tiers (Re: Level3)
  
• 06/18/01 Level3
  

ASV

• 06/28/01 ISP's who filter ICMP during DoS?
  

Austin Schutz

• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/11/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/11/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Definition of Tier-1
  

Avi Freedman

• 06/18/01 Re: Opinions about InterNAP
  

Barney Wolff

• 06/27/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  

Barrows, Jeff

• 06/08/01 RE: Tiers and other sales speak
  
• 06/06/01 RE: Countdown until UUNET policy affects
  
• 06/06/01 RE: C&W/PSI restore connectivity (peerin
  

Barton F Bruce

• 06/08/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  

Benny Fischer

• 06/23/01 RE: Qwest.Net / US West.Net
  

Bert Rossi

• 06/10/01 Re: /24s run amuck again
  

Bill Nickless

• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  
• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  

Bill Woodcock

• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 IETF draft on Operator Requirements of N
  
• 06/03/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/01/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Bleetzin Boopzin

• 06/21/01 Deaggregation of class B..
  

bmanning

• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  

Bohdan Tashchuk

• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  

Brad

• 06/28/01 Re: Qwest fiber cut near Boulder?
  

Brad Verd

• 06/12/01 gTLD Informational Message
  

Brandon Ross

• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

BrandonButterworth

• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/06/01 Re: And then there were two
  

Brett Frankenberger

• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  

Brian Wallingford

• 06/30/01 Re: Statement of WorldCom, Inc. on Nasda
  

Bruce Campbell

• 06/26/01 RE: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  

Bruce Robertson

• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  

Chance Whaley

• 06/27/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  

Charles Scott

• 06/18/01 RE: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/17/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/13/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  
• 06/12/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  
• 06/12/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  
• 06/12/01 Intellectual Property Claim Service for
  
• 06/10/01 PSI, NetZero contact?
  
• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/03/01 Measuring traffic (WAS: 95th Percentile
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/01/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 C&W Peering Problem?
  

Charles Sprickman

• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/24/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/22/01 Re: IP Addresses for colocation
  
• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  

Chris Adams

• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/15/01 Re: a.root-servers.net power issue (why
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Chris Horry

• 06/25/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  

Chris Parker

• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  

Chris Rapier

• 06/29/01 Re: Akamai Servers: Normal or Weird?
  
• 06/29/01 Re: Akamai Servers: Normal or Weird?
  
• 06/29/01 Akamai Servers: Normal or Weird?
  
• 06/29/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/29/01 Re: Network Riddle
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Network Riddle
  
• 06/28/01 Network Riddle
  

Chris White

• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  

Christian Kuhtz

• 06/28/01 MIX status (Re: New NAP Opening in Miami
  
• 06/28/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/20/01 aol rejects mailing lists?
  

Christian Nielsen

• 06/29/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/05/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  

Christopher A. Woodfield

• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/20/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/15/01 Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  
• 06/14/01 Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  
• 06/14/01 Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  
• 06/13/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/05/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/02/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/01/01 PSINet Files Chapter 11...
  

Christopher Johnston

• 06/13/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Christopher L. Morrow

• 06/29/01 RE: ISP's who filter ICMP during DoS?
  

Clayton Fiske

• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  

Craig A. Haney

• 06/06/01 Internet Traffic Discovery?
  

Craig Partridge

• 06/12/01 BBN & history (was Re: New list Top 10 I
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Bell Labs' Discovery May Lead to Eff
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Bell Labs' Discovery May Lead to Eff
  

Crist Clark

• 06/07/01 Re: HTML-format postings (Re: NANOG Dige
  

Cutler, James R

• 06/22/01 RE: IP Addresses for colocation
  

Dalvenjah FoxFire

• 06/07/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/05/01 Re: Rooted boxen and the law
  
• 06/05/01 Re: Rooted boxen and the law
  

Dan Foster

• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Dan Hollis

• 06/13/01 sprint supervisors
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/06/01 Negligent companies face DDOS liability
  
• 06/04/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Daniel Golding

• 06/29/01 RE: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/28/01 RE: MIX status (Re: New NAP Opening in M
  
• 06/28/01 RE: East Coast Outages?
  
• 06/28/01 RE: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/28/01 RE: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/18/01 RE: 360networks withdraws plans to acqui
  
• 06/06/01 RE: C&W Explination (fwd)
  
• 06/04/01 RE: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  

Daniel Karrenberg

• 06/25/01 Re: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  

Daniel Senie

• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  

Dave Israel

• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  

David Charlap

• 06/15/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

David Diaz

• 06/01/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  

David Howe

• 06/24/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/15/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

David Klindt

• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  

David Lesher

• 06/28/01 Jim Ellis
  
• 06/28/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/28/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/26/01 SBC Contract Post (fwd)
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exploding manhole covers in Washingt
  
• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  

David McGaugh

• 06/13/01 Re: Opinions about InterNAP
  

David R Huberman

• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  

David R. Conrad

• 06/26/01 History of 24/8 (was RE: for folks track
  

David S. Diaz

• 06/28/01 RE: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  

David Schwartz

• 06/28/01 RE: ISP's who filter ICMP during DoS?
  
• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/13/01 RE: Opinions about InterNAP
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile again!
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile again!
  

David Sinn

• 06/06/01 RE: C&W Perring
  

Dee McKinney

• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferio
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/19/01 OT - Need Bell South Contact
  
• 06/18/01 RE: opinions on routers/switches for par
  
• 06/06/01 RE: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/01/01 Outage ?
  

Deepak Jain

• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 Operational Content, I think...
  
• 06/24/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/21/01 RE: IP Addresses for collocation
  
• 06/14/01 RE: Exploding manhole covers in Washingt
  
• 06/12/01 RE: New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/09/01 Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/06/01 RE: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  
• 06/05/01 RE: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/04/01 RE: A moment of silence.
  

Derek Balling

• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/26/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  

Deron J. Ringen

• 06/07/01 RE: Bell Labs' Discovery May Lead to Eff
  

Dominic J. Eidson

• 06/20/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  

Dorian Kim

• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  

E.B. Dreger

• 06/27/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/27/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/19/01 OT: No More Tiers (Re: Level3)
  
• 06/11/01 non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Definition of Tier-1
  
• 06/07/01 Re: C&W Network
  
• 06/07/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Ellen Handcock

• 06/22/01 EXDS needs your money!
  

Eric A. Hall

• 06/28/01 Re: Network Riddle
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine

• 06/13/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  
• 06/13/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  
• 06/12/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  
• 06/12/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  

Eric Gauthier

• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/06/01 Re: And then there were two
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Eric Oosting

• 06/23/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  

Eric Whitehill

• 06/04/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  
• 06/04/01 ORBS go bye bye?
  

Erik Antelman

• 06/14/01 What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  

Fletcher E Kittredge

• 06/29/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferio
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferio
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/24/01 Re: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  
• 06/11/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Forrest Houston

• 06/01/01 RE: PSINet Files Chapter 11...
  

Frank T. Suraci

• 06/27/01 OT: Useful PDA software
  

Geoff Huston

• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/07/01 Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ]
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Geoff Zinderdine

• 06/04/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

George Michaelson

• 06/07/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

George William Herbert

• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  

ggm

• 06/07/01 APNIC allocation policy documentation
  

Gordon Cook

• 06/13/01 Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service
  

Gordon Ewasiuk

• 06/27/01 Re: Is this normal?
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  

Greg A. Woods

• 06/29/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  
• 06/25/01 RE: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Bell Labs' Discovery May Lead to Eff
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile again!
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile again!
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again!
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again!
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 06/27/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/19/01 Re: Routing Table inconsistencies
  
• 06/11/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/05/01 RE: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/04/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

hardie

• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/07/01 Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ]
  

Henry Yen

• 06/04/01 OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile = L
  

Hire, Ejay

• 06/21/01 RE: IP Addresses for collocation
  
• 06/15/01 RE: Mae-East FDDI funeral
  
• 06/14/01 RE: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  

Howard C. Berkowitz

• 06/27/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  

Irwin Lazar

• 06/07/01 Bell Labs' Discovery May Lead to Efficie
  

J.D. Falk

• 06/30/01 Re: Statement of WorldCom, Inc. on Nasda
  
• 06/13/01 ACL aggregation tool
  
• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Definition of Tier-1
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  

J.F. Noonan

• 06/21/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  
• 06/20/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  

Jake L

• 06/04/01 Asset/Inventory tracking
  

James DeMong

• 06/06/01 RE: Hosting Failover Question
  
• 06/06/01 Hosting Failover Question
  

James Thomason

• 06/06/01 Re: Self Regulation (was Re: New peering
  
• 06/06/01 Re: New peering criteria
  
• 06/06/01 Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ]
  
• 06/05/01 Re: C&W Peering (and nTH Percentile Unit
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile = Lame (fwd)
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/03/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 95th Percentile = Lame
  

Jamie Norwood

• 06/05/01 Rooted boxen and the law
  

Jared Mauch

• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/19/01 Re: Routing Table inconsistencies
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/09/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Jason Legate

• 06/11/01 Re: Houston problems?
  
• 06/11/01 Houston problems?
  

Jason Lewis

• 06/28/01 RE: Problems between CW and Global Cross
  
• 06/28/01 Problems between CW and Global Crossing
  
• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/08/01 Tiers and other sales speak
  
• 06/03/01 RE: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/01/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  

Jeff Mcadams

• 06/26/01 Re: SBC Contract Post (fwd)
  
• 06/25/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/06/01 Re: New peering criteria
  
• 06/02/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  

Jeff Ogden

• 06/05/01 Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  

Jeffrey Meltzer

• 06/07/01 Re: C&W Network
  

Jeremiah Kristal

• 06/04/01 Telco provisioning
  

Jeremy Hartman

• 06/24/01 Re: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  

Jerry Scharf

• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  
• 06/02/01 Re: The early days of peering
  

Jesper Skriver

• 06/01/01 Re: mac-address accounting
  

Jim Mercer

• 06/21/01 Re: Deaggregation of class B..
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/05/01 Re: small exchanges (was: Re: PSINet and
  
• 06/05/01 TorIX contact info
  
• 06/05/01 Re: small exchanges (was: Re: PSINet and
  
• 06/05/01 Re: small exchanges (was: Re: PSINet and
  
• 06/05/01 small exchanges (was: Re: PSINet and C&W
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Jim Popovitch

• 06/28/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Exodus Down
  

Jim Shankland

• 06/25/01 Virtues of NAT (was Re: Cable Modem [rea
  
• 06/07/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

jlewis

• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Joao Takeda

• 06/08/01 SONET and full duplex
  

Joe Abley

• 06/29/01 unscientific multi-homing survey: result
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 straw poll for multi-homed operators
  
• 06/18/01 Re: opinions on routers/switches for par
  
• 06/14/01 Re: ACL aggregation tool
  
• 06/04/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  
• 06/04/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/01/01 Re: PSINet Files Chapter 11...
  

Joe Blanchard

• 06/04/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/04/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  

Joe Provo

• 06/29/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  

Joe Shaw

• 06/24/01 OT: Guns (was RE: Exodus Down)
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Negligent companies face DDOS liabil
  

Joel Jaeggli

• 06/21/01 Re: Deaggregation of class B..
  
• 06/09/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Joel Lafleur

• 06/05/01 RE: small exchanges (was: Re: PSINet and
  

John Butler

• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  

John Crain

• 06/12/01 RE: standards for giving out blocks of I
  

John Fraizer

• 06/26/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/15/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/12/01 Re: Houston problems?
  
• 06/08/01 RE: Tiers and other sales speak
  
• 06/08/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/07/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/05/01 Re: small exchanges (was: Re: PSINet and
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  

john heasley

• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/02/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  

John Kloian III

• 06/28/01 RE: East Coast Outages?
  
• 06/28/01 East Coast Outages?
  

John Neiberger

• 06/27/01 Re: Qwest fiber cut near Boulder?
  

John Olp

• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/14/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

John Payne

• 06/07/01 Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format
  
• 06/04/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  

John Starta

• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  

Jonas Luster

• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  
• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt? RE: Exodus Do
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/07/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  

Jonathan Disher

• 06/27/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt? RE: Exodus Do
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  
• 06/24/01 Re: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  
• 06/18/01 Re: opinions on routers/switches for par
  
• 06/13/01 Re: Opinions about InterNAP
  
• 06/11/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  

Joseph T. Klein

• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  

Josh Richards

• 06/18/01 360networks withdraws plans to acquire N
  
• 06/14/01 Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  
• 06/14/01 Re: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  
• 06/12/01 Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  

Joshua Goodall

• 06/24/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/17/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/08/01 Re: backup relationships possibly harmfu
  

k claffy

• 06/08/01 Re: Definition of Tier-1
  
• 06/06/01 3GB month limit to telstra users
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  

Karyn Ulriksen

• 06/08/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/01/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 Mindspring
  

keichii

• 06/18/01 opinions on routers/switches for paralle
  

ken harris.

• 06/05/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Kevin Day

• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  

Kevin Facinelli

• 06/19/01 Re: Level3
  

Kevin Loch

• 06/28/01 Re: East Coast Outages?
  
• 06/22/01 qrz.com outage yesterday
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Krzysztof Adamski

• 06/21/01 RE: IP Addresses for collocation
  

Kurt Kayser

• 06/26/01 Looking for x.org
  

Larry Diffey

• 06/29/01 Cisco IOS Vulnerability
  
• 06/29/01 Re: Nasdaq Breaks Down for 2nd Day, Disr
  
• 06/28/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/28/01 New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/27/01 Is this normal?
  
• 06/27/01 Re: RFC 1771, further thoughts
  

Larry Sheldon

• 06/28/01 Re: Peering Breakeven Analysis White Pap
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Network Riddle
  
• 06/07/01 Re: And then there were two
  
• 06/06/01 Re: And then there were two
  

Lee Howard

• 06/22/01 Re: [OT] Lucent max tnt config
  

Leo Bicknell

• 06/24/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Tiers and other sales speak
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/03/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/03/01 A moment of silence.
  
• 06/02/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  

Los, Ralph

• 06/29/01 RE: ISP's who filter ICMP during DoS?
  
• 06/15/01 Frame-Relay vs. ATM?
  
• 06/08/01 What is going on at Ameritech/SBC?!
  
• 06/05/01 RE: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/01/01 RE: PSINet Files Chapter 11...
  

lucifer

• 06/27/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Qwest fiber cut near Boulder?
  
• 06/27/01 Re: RFC 1771, further thoughts
  
• 06/27/01 Re: RFC 1771, further thoughts
  
• 06/26/01 RFC 1771, further thoughts
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/24/01 Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Lucy E. Lynch

• 06/20/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  

M. David Leonard

• 06/06/01 HTML-format postings
  

Majdi S. Abbas

• 06/28/01 Re: MIX status (Re: New NAP Opening in M
  
• 06/27/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/18/01 Re: 360networks withdraws plans to acqui
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  

Marius Strom

• 06/12/01 Re: Houston problems?
  

Mark Borchers

• 06/28/01 RE: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/12/01 RE: Houston problems?
  

Mark J. Scheller

• 06/23/01 Re: IP Addresses for colocation
  
• 06/21/01 IP Addresses for colocation
  

Mark Mentovai

• 06/04/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Mark Radabaugh - Amplex

• 06/04/01 RE: A little assist please..
  

Marshall Eubanks

• 06/27/01 Re: RFC 1771, further thoughts
  
• 06/18/01 Routing Table inconsistencies
  
• 06/13/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Martin Picard

• 06/28/01 Re: Peering Breakeven Analysis White Pap
  

Martin, Christian

• 06/12/01 RE: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/01/01 RE: mac-address accounting
  
• 06/01/01 RE: mac-address accounting
  

Masataka Ohta

• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/02/01 Re: QOS or more bandwidth
  

Matt Levine

• 06/27/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/23/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/12/01 RE: cogentco.com technical analysis?
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  
• 06/01/01 RE: PSINet Files Chapter 11...
  

Matt Zito

• 06/04/01 RE: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/04/01 RE: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Michael C . Wu

• 06/19/01 Re: opinions on routers/switches for par
  

Michael J. Ignosci

• 06/19/01 Re: [OT] Lucent max tnt config
  

Michael Painter

• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  

Michael Whisenant

• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/06/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Michelle T

• 06/08/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  

Mikael Abrahamsson

• 06/24/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/08/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Bell Labs' Discovery May Lead to Eff
  
• 06/07/01 top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format post
  
• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile = Lame
  

Mike Batchelor

• 06/25/01 RE: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  

mike harrison

• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 Re: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/24/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Exodus Down
  
• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/04/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/01/01 Re: Outage ?
  

Mike Hughes

• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Mike Leber

• 06/23/01 Re: IP Addresses for colocation
  
• 06/02/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  

Mike Smith

• 06/27/01 ARIN and RIPE
  

Miquel van Smoorenburg

• 06/27/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  

Mitch Halmu

• 06/13/01 Re: Opinions about InterNAP
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Enron (was Re: C&W peering)
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  

Mitchell Levinn

• 06/05/01 PSINet and C&W peering
  

Moe Allen

• 06/25/01 Cisco Routers
  
• 06/07/01 C&W Network
  
• 06/06/01 Re: C&W Perring
  
• 06/06/01 C&W Perring
  
• 06/06/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 C&W Peering
  

Morris, Gary

• 06/05/01 Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  

Murphy, Brennan

• 06/25/01 Eliminate Dependency on Telefonica in Br
  
• 06/12/01 cogentco.com technical analysis?
  

nanog-poster

• 06/25/01 Warning: AS14897 leaking routes
  

Nathan Stratton

• 06/18/01 Re: 360networks withdraws plans to acqui
  

Neil J. McRae

• 06/27/01 Re: Looking for x.org
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Eliminate Dependency on Telefonica i
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  

Nick Thompson

• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  

Nipper, Arnold

• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Omachonu Ogali

• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/13/01 Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
  

Owen DeLong

• 06/29/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/26/01 Re: SBC Contract Post (fwd)
  

pasi.vaananen

• 06/07/01 RE: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  

Patrick Greenwell

• 06/27/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  

Patrick W. Gilmore

• 06/05/01 Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Paul A Vixie

• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/03/01 apologia
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Paul Froutan

• 06/06/01 RE: Hosting Failover Question
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Hosting Failover Question
  

Paul Johnson

• 06/04/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Paul Lantinga

• 06/11/01 RE: Houston problems?
  
• 06/06/01 RE: HTML-format postings
  

Paul Vixie

• 06/29/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Pete Ashdown

• 06/28/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/28/01 Open Peers at PAIX
  

Pete Kruckenberg

• 06/29/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/24/01 BGP announcements 'stuck' in route-refle
  
• 06/12/01 Re: New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  

PETER JANSEN

• 06/28/01 Re: Peering Breakeven Analysis White Pap
  
• 06/12/01 Re: New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/07/01 CABLE & WIRELESS STATEMENT
  

Philip Smith

• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  

Pim van Riezen

• 06/28/01 Re: ISP's who filter ICMP during DoS?
  
• 06/25/01 Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferio
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/07/01 Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format
  

Poon Keen Mun

• 06/22/01 Re: Routing Problem?
  
• 06/22/01 Routing Problem?
  

prelude

• 06/24/01 Re: Operational Content, I think...
  

Przemyslaw Karwasiecki

• 06/26/01 RE: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/24/01 What is evil: IP spoofing or Distributed
  

Rachel Luxemburg

• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  

Rachel Warren

• 06/10/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  

Rafi Sadowsky

• 06/29/01 Re: ISP's who filter ICMP during DoS?
  
• 06/12/01 Re: New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/07/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Randy Bush

• 06/29/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: Peering LSR Violation]
  
• 06/27/01 Re: OT: Useful PDA software
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/26/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Definition of Tier-1
  
• 06/07/01 backup relationships possibly harmful
  
• 06/04/01 RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: Limited peering battle (was RE: C&W
  

rich

• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  

Rich Fulton

• 06/24/01 RE: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  

Rich Sena

• 06/04/01 A little assist please..
  
• 06/04/01 RE: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  

Richard A. Steenbergen

• 06/29/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/28/01 RE: East Coast Outages?
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/28/01 Re: Open Peers at PAIX
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/25/01 RE: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  
• 06/25/01 RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Re: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/14/01 Re: Exploding manhole covers in Washingt
  
• 06/11/01 Re: Houston problems?
  
• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/10/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/09/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/08/01 RE: /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/08/01 /24s run amuck again
  
• 06/04/01 Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  
• 06/04/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/04/01 RE: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/04/01 RE: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile != Lame
  
• 06/03/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again!
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/03/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  
• 06/02/01 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peeri
  

Richard Jimmerson

• 06/21/01 ARIN to Allocate from 67.0.0.0/8 and 68.
  
• 06/18/01 RE: standards for giving out blocks of I
  

Richard Welty

• 06/28/01 Re: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/27/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  
• 06/06/01 RE: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  
• 06/04/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  

Rick Irving

• 06/29/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: Peering LSR Violation]
  
• 06/29/01 Re: [Fwd: Re: Peering LSR Violation]
  
• 06/29/01 [Fwd: Re: Peering LSR Violation]
  

Rishi Singh

• 06/29/01 My apologies to the list
  
• 06/29/01 Nasdaq Breaks Down for 2nd Day, Disrupts
  
• 06/12/01 RE: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/11/01 RE: Houston problems?
  
• 06/07/01 RE: Hosting Failover Question
  

RJ Atkinson

• 06/25/01 Re: for folks tracking DDOS sources or r
  
• 06/25/01 Re: address allocations
  
• 06/23/01 for folks tracking DDOS sources or readi
  
• 06/23/01 Re: more on IP source filtering...
  
• 06/23/01 Re: anti-spoofing filters
  
• 06/12/01 Routing anomaly within ATT.NET
  
• 06/12/01 Re: New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Definition of Tier-1
  
• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  

rkuhljr

• 06/25/01 Re:Eliminate Dependency on Telefonica in
  

rmg

• 06/27/01 1.0.0.0/8 given away? Yay???
  

Robert Beverly

• 06/11/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Robert E. Seastrom

• 06/29/01 Re: Akamai Servers: Normal or Weird?
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/18/01 Re: Routing Table inconsistencies
  
• 06/15/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Roger Marquis

• 06/22/01 Re: IP Addresses for colocation
  

Roland Dobbins

• 06/29/01 Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability
  
• 06/24/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/23/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  

Ron Buchalski

• 06/08/01 Re: SONET and full duplex
  
• 06/08/01 Re: SONET and full duplex
  
• 06/06/01 Re: And then there were two
  

Ron da Silva

• 06/07/01 Re: Self Regulation (was Re: New peering
  

Rowland, Alan D

• 06/28/01 RE: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  

Roy

• 06/27/01 Re: Qwest fiber cut near Boulder?
  

Sabri Berisha

• 06/19/01 [OT] Lucent max tnt config
  

Saint skullY the Dazed

• 06/26/01 Re: OT: new NANOG shirt?
  

Sam Thomas

• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  
• 06/06/01 Re: And then there were two
  

Scott Francis

• 06/27/01 Re: Is this normal?
  
• 06/12/01 Re: Houston problems?
  

Scott Gifford

• 06/05/01 Re: Rooted boxen and the law
  

Scott Patterson

• 06/06/01 RE: C&W Perring
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  
• 06/01/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  

scott w

• 06/26/01 OT: new NANOG shirt? RE: Exodus Down
  
• 06/08/01 more tier 1 definitions was: Why so lit
  
• 06/04/01 Re: OT: electrical [was: 95th Percentile
  

Sean Donelan

• 06/29/01 Statement of WorldCom, Inc. on Nasdaq Ne
  
• 06/29/01 Re: My apologies to the list
  
• 06/29/01 Re: Nasdaq Breaks Down for 2nd Day, Disr
  
• 06/29/01 RE: New NAP Opening in Miami this week
  
• 06/27/01 Qwest fiber cut near Boulder?
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 Re: RFC 1771, further thoughts
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 Time to revise RFC 1771
  
• 06/26/01 RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23
  
• 06/24/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/23/01 RE: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down)
  
• 06/14/01 a.root-servers.net power issue (why ther
  
• 06/14/01 Exploding manhole covers in Washington D
  
• 06/13/01 Contingency Planning
  
• 06/12/01 Re: New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/12/01 New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/12/01 Summary of Houston problems (was Re: Hou
  
• 06/11/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/08/01 New mailing list: model-peer
  
• 06/07/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/06/01 Re: New peering criteria
  
• 06/06/01 Enron (was Re: C&W peering)
  
• 06/06/01 Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/06/01 New peering criteria
  
• 06/05/01 Countdown until UUNET policy affects exi
  
• 06/05/01 C&W/PSI restore connectivity (peering?)
  
• 06/05/01 And then there were two
  
• 06/04/01 Agis, PSI, next C&W?
  
• 06/04/01 PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/03/01 mae-east customer service (Re: A moment
  
• 06/02/01 Re: The early days of peering
  
• 06/02/01 The original UUNET opinion on asymetric
  
• 06/02/01 The early days of peering
  
• 06/02/01 Limited peering battle (was RE: C&W Pee
  
• 06/01/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  
• 06/01/01 Location for Henry Hub LA
  

Sean M. Doran

• 06/23/01 DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/22/01 Re: Routing Problem?
  
• 06/22/01 Re: IP Addresses for colocation
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/06/01 Self Regulation (was Re: New peering cri
  
• 06/06/01 small adaptation of jsb's message on pee
  
• 06/06/01 RE: PSINet and C&W peering
  

Sehmel, William C.

• 06/24/01 OSDN network back up Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Exodus Down
  

Seth M. Kusiak

• 06/13/01 Opinions about InterNAP
  
• 06/13/01 Opinions about InterNAP
  

shane

• 06/05/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/05/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

shsu

• 06/12/01 multihoming standard for a small ISP cli
  
• 06/12/01 standards for giving out blocks of IP ad
  

Simon Leinen

• 06/07/01 Re: jumbo frames
  
• 06/01/01 Re: mac-address accounting
  

Simon Lockhart

• 06/07/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/07/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/03/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/03/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/03/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  
• 06/01/01 Re: C&W Peering Problem?
  

Simon Lyall

• 06/29/01 Re: Akamai Servers: Normal or Weird?
  
• 06/23/01 Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecd
  
• 06/08/01 Re: /24s run amuck again
  

Smith, Marcellus

• 06/06/01 RE: C&W/PSI restore connectivity (peerin
  
• 06/06/01 RE: PSINet and C&W peering
  

srihari varada

• 06/08/01 (no subject)
  

Stephen Griffin

• 06/25/01 Re: Cisco Routers
  
• 06/22/01 Re: [OT] Lucent max tnt config
  
• 06/08/01 OT: What is going on at Ameritech/SBC?!
  
• 06/05/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  

Stephen J. Wilcox

• 06/09/01 Re: C&W peering
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Bell Labs' Discovery May Lead to Eff
  
• 06/01/01 Re: PSINet Files Chapter 11...
  

Steve Feldman

• 06/07/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/04/01 Re: A moment of silence.
  

Steve Goldstein

• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  

Steve Meuse

• 06/04/01 Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
  

Steve Robinski

• 06/11/01 Cisco HA (High Availability) for Cat6509
  

Steve Rude

• 06/12/01 Re: cogentco.com technical analysis?
  

Steve Schaefer

• 06/27/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X'
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/20/01 Re: aol rejects mailing lists?
  
• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/12/01 Re: Routing anomaly within ATT.NET
  
• 06/08/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/07/01 Re: New peering criteria [ and Enron ]
  
• 06/07/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  
• 06/04/01 Traceloop between PSI and C&W
  
• 06/01/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  

Steve Sobol

• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/05/01 Re: PSINet and C&W peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: ORBS go bye bye?
  

Steven J. Sobol

• 06/30/01 Re: Statement of WorldCom, Inc. on Nasda
  
• 06/27/01 RE: Qwest.Net / US West.Net
  
• 06/27/01 RE: Qwest.Net / US West.Net
  
• 06/26/01 Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
  
• 06/24/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Qwest.Net / US West.Net
  
• 06/23/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  

Steven M. Bellovin

• 06/09/01 Re: /24s run amuck again
  

Susan Harris

• 06/04/01 Next NANOG meeting
  

Sykes, Phil

• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Thomas R. Charron

• 06/15/01 RE: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/14/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Tim Devries

• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  

Tim Langdell, PhD

• 06/01/01 ZoneEdit Down?
  

Tim Wilde

• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/11/01 RE: Houston problems?
  
• 06/03/01 RE: A moment of silence.
  

Tim Winders

• 06/18/01 Re: Routing Table inconsistencies
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/10/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  
• 06/09/01 Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones
  

Timothy Brown

• 06/02/01 Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W P
  

Timothy R. McKee

• 06/25/01 RE: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferio
  

Toby_Williams

• 06/06/01 Re: C&W peering
  

Todd Suiter

• 06/23/01 Re: Few questions to the american ISPs [
  
• 06/07/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/07/01 Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format
  
• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  

Tony Bates

• 06/30/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 06/23/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 06/16/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 06/09/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 06/02/01 The Cidr Report
  

Tony Tauber

• 06/13/01 RE: Prefix-length FUD (was: Re: Opinions
  
• 06/13/01 Prefix-legth FUD (was: Re: Opinions abou
  

Travis Pugh

• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/11/01 Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1)
  
• 06/08/01 Re: Definition of Tier-1
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

up

• 06/29/01 Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/16/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/13/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/01/01 Re: PSINet Files Chapter 11...
  

Valdis.Kletnieks

• 06/27/01 Re: Is this normal?
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's
  
• 06/24/01 Re: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/19/01 Re: OT: No More Tiers (Re: Level3)
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/12/01 Re: standards for giving out blocks of I
  
• 06/12/01 Re: New list Top 10 ISPs
  
• 06/07/01 Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format
  
• 06/07/01 Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
  
• 06/06/01 Re: HTML-format postings
  
• 06/04/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  
• 06/04/01 Re: 95th Percentile = Lame
  

Vijay Gill

• 06/22/01 Re: [OT] Lucent max tnt config
  
• 06/06/01 Re: New peering criteria
  
• 06/06/01 Re: New peering criteria
  
• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  

Vinay Bannai

• 06/08/01 Re: SONET and full duplex
  

Vincent Gillet

• 06/11/01 Wave length for OC48 : Summary
  
• 06/07/01 POS OC48 interfaces using different wave
  

Vincent J. Bono

• 06/05/01 Re: C&W Peering
  

Vivien M.

• 06/24/01 RE: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 RE: BGP instability (was Re: Exodus Down
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/23/01 RE: DDOS anecdotes
  
• 06/14/01 RE: What is up with 170.36.0.0/16
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  
• 06/04/01 RE: C&W Peering
  
• 06/02/01 RE: C&W Peering Problem?
  

Walter Prue

• 06/06/01 Re: Internet Traffic Discovery?
  
• 06/01/01 Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
  

Walters

• 06/08/01 RE: C&W Network
  

Wayne Bouchard

• 06/29/01 Re: Nasdaq Breaks Down for 2nd Day, Disr
  
• 06/07/01 Re: POS OC48 interfaces using different
  

William Allen Simpson

• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really more about PPPoE
  

William B. Norton

• 06/28/01 Peering Breakeven Analysis White Paper
  

William Charnock

• 06/06/01 re:Small Exchanges
  

Wojtek Zlobicki

• 06/27/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/27/01 Re: Is this normal?
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engi
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  
• 06/26/01 Re: Cable Modem [really good network des
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month