North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes)

  • From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki
  • Date: Tue Jun 26 14:04:14 2001

But please don't forget that in this particular DDoS event
there was no IP spoofing.

So anti-spoofing precautions, either on administrative or technical
level, would be useless in this case.

And this case is not so untypical.

my .002$

Przemek

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Paul Vixie
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: peering requirements (Re: DDOS anecdotes)



Following up on my own post:

[email protected] (Paul Vixie) writes:

> Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language
like:
> ...

Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc)
and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at
this stage of the game.

This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is
not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read
NANOG.

This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.