North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: C&W Peering
This is sure to create a number of "big pipe orphans". I wonder if this will create a surge in multihoming attempts? How could you discourage that now? Unlike the recent DSL disasters, you can't just say "buy a T1 if you want reliable service". Even if you are not a PSI customer, it would be foolish not to multihome now. Did C&W consider the route table effects of this new routing policy? KL "Patrick W. Gilmore" wrote: > > At 05:44 PM 6/4/2001 -0400, Travis Pugh wrote: > > >route-views.oregon-ix.net concurs: > > > >route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp regex ^3561_174_ > > > >route-views.oregon-ix.net> > > Yes, but if one or the other has backup peering, it would not look like > that. It would look like _3561_.*_174_ or _174_.*_3561_ - prolly the > former since AS3561 gives route-views a feed, but AS714 does not. > > Looking in route-views for those two patterns, I see only a few routes > under 3561.*_174_, probably leakage. There are no routes of the form > _174_.*_3561_. > > Since route-views does have a feed from AS3561, I would say it is > official. Cable and Wireless cannot reach PSI.net. > > Congratulations ladies & gentlemen. The first intentional, prolonged, > significant (for some values of "significant" :) outage on the > Internet. And we were all here to see it.... > > Wow, in the same week MAE-East dies. Sad time for the 'Net. :(( > > >-travis > > -- > TTFN, > patrick
|