North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: C&W Perring

  • From: Scott Patterson
  • Date: Wed Jun 06 14:17:30 2001
Title: Message
I would guess it is PSI.  They are trying to see exactly how much traffic they can force to other networks by pre-pending and probably (I don't know how their routing is setup) setting lpref on the c&w sessions to their lowest possible.  Then they will know what traffic is only available through c&w.  Then they will prob see how many of these people they can peer directly with or sell services to during the 60 day continuation.
 
 
Scott
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of David Sinn
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Nanog
Subject: RE: C&W Perring

So which side is doing the pre-pending?
 
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path

*  12.10.44.0/23    166.49.26.73            50    100      0 3561 174 174 174 174 4550 11937 i

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Moe Allen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:33 AM
To: Nanog
Subject: C&W Perring

To all:
   
    I just got off the phone with Cable & Wireless.  A 60 day continuation of peering with PSINET was reached last night.  The peering is back up and we can now find PSINET DNS server again.  More on this as I am made aware.
Respectfully,
Morris Allen
President
VidcomNet, Inc.