|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement...
Yes. It can also be configured to do a variety of other things, and send all sorts of malformed information. It just takes time, patience, skill, and desire to configure it to do so. It also happens to be how some vendors, and providers, involved in this debacle confirmed the issue. .chance > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > Joe Abley > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:01 PM > To: Richard A. Steenbergen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... > > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:43:35PM -0400, Richard A. > Steenbergen wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:38:28PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote: > > > What BGP acceptance tests do people currently run against > prospective > > > vendors' hardware? > > > > QA Robot > > > > http://advanced.comms.agilent.com/qarobot/ > > Does that expose the RFC3065 issue if you run it against vendor C's > implementations? > > > Joe
|