North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: C&W Peering Problem?
It seems as if a good solution to this kind of an imbalance would be for the peering partners to agree to listen to each others' MEDs. That way access provider B gets the traffic handed to them a close to the destination as possible. True, that means they need a beefier backbone, but the value in the peering arrangements they don't lose as a result of imbalanced traffic would seem to compensate. Are there any known iplementations like this among backbone providers? -C > > My understanding, based on talking to some people who run networks like > @Home which are totally access providers, is that the theory they use it > this. Let's say you have network A, a big access network, and network H, a > hosting network. > If the two networks peer in San Jose, Dallas, Chicago, New York, and > Washington, DC, and network H's biggest data centers are in San Jose but > network A's biggest customer base is in New York, that means that network H > sends lots of traffic through the San Jose peering link, and then network A > needs to carry tons of traffic on their backbone all the way to New York. > Meanwhile, network A sends acks and similar things to network H, and a > majority of those go through the New York peering link, and are then taken > back to San Jose on network H. The problem, the way network A sees it, is > that they might need to get an OC48 between San Jose and New York, whereas > network H can get away with an OC3/OC12 on the same path. > Thus, network A finds it unjust that they have to pay all this money for > this OC48 when network H, which is the network sending them all this > traffic, can get away with a much cheaper circuit, and thus they use this > excuse to try and bill network H in order to make as much money as possible. > Thus the "free ride" argument.. --------------------------- Christopher A. Woodfield [email protected] PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
|