North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement...
> > On Tue, 26 June 2001, "Matt Levine" wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > <sigh>... If the RFC jumped off a cliff... > Pointless and irrelevant. Do you follow the accepted standard or not - that is what it comes down to. Bugs are bugs and everyone has them, big deal. However, there is a general consensus about how things are supposed to work - interoperability is somewhat difficult in this day and age without it. So which is it? Follow the standards - be they RFC, STD, draft, de facto, or de jure - or roll your own and pray? No one has stated that closing the session is bad thing, and the general feeling is that its a good thing. So what is it that you want? .chance (rambling on only for himself and not representing anyone else)
|