|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses
VERY true... Many a times the closing during a contract will be the reminder to the salesperson, "So, you know we still need those 4 /24s right, as we discussed when we first met?" Then a phone a call is made and some words exchanged and the answer is, "My boss says he can do that for you, but he needs the contract back today to reserve them." :-). -----Original Message----- From: Martin, Christian [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:38 PM To: 'Kevin Loch' Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: standards for giving out blocks of IP addresses > Of course bandwidth != subnet mask. He should give them > whatever IP's > they demonstrate a need for in the next three months. Determining and > justifying that > need has nothing to do with how over (or under) subscribed their > bandwidth is. Let us not forget what some salespersons will promise to potential large bandwidth customers. An OC-3 POS customer, for example, can expect many many /24s. One may say "They should go to ARIN", but alas, they would have to pay another $2500 on top of the $1 million+ they are paying for transit. <8{} It is surprising how much a salesperson will "sell" to get the commission on a 5 year OC-3 contract, forget about OC-12/48... So, in some cases, like it or not, bandwidth sold is proportional to IP addresses. chris > > If they are in fact only selling dialup (not leased lines, not web > hosting), > you might ask how many pops(locations) they plan to have right away, > modems/pop, space > reserved for internal devices (email/corporate lan) and links. You > could > easially justify a couple of /24's with a couple locations > and IP's for > all the new PC's in the marketing dept. > > KL >
|