|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: /24s run amuck again
Your customers are paying for Internet connectivity. If they're unable to reach the sites they desire as a result of your intention actions (filtering announcements), why should they continue to pay you? While I fully support and expect route aggregation whenever possible, it is unreasonable to believe that everything fits in nice pretty packages. If you're unwilling to accept diverse /22 announcements without payment, why should we not expect the same for the /24's you're announcing? jas At 11:56 AM 6/9/01 -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > There are lots of reasons to have some diverse /22 announcements in your > network for example. but if you are not paying me, what reasons are there for me to spend my resources (route bloat) so you can engineer your traffic? randy
|