Beginning February 01 2001
Messages: 956
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

[Put-your-name-here]

• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  

Aaron Campbell

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

Aaron Moreau-Cook

• 02/17/01 RE: T3 Latency
  
• 02/16/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

abha

• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Adam McKenna

• 02/28/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Adam Rothschild

• 02/28/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/08/01 [[email protected]: New "operational
  
• 02/07/01 Re: Social responsibility (censorship?)
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

Adrian Chadd

• 02/28/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/10/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/08/01 Re: Social responsibility (censorship?)
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Akio Sugeno

• 02/25/01 RE: IXs
  
• 02/25/01 Re: IXs
  

Alan Clegg

• 02/14/01 Cingular Wireless drops below 99.999
  

Alan Hannan

• 02/17/01 Re: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/06/01 Re: Software to Track IP Address Assignm
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

Alex

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  

Alex Bligh

• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Delicious Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

Alex Pilosov

• 02/28/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  
• 02/16/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/28/01 RE: IXs
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/14/01 Re: Abovenet BGP upgrade problems
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

Alexander Kiwerski

• 02/27/01 RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/27/01 RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  

Andrew Brown

• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  

Andy

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Re[2]: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/05/01 Re: PhoenixDSL/Telocity/Megapath
  

Andy Dills

• 02/22/01 DS3 Ordering Experiences
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear (Last one by me)
  

Andy Grosser

• 02/08/01 single NIC stats monitoring tool
  
• 02/06/01 NetSaint
  

Anthony Pardini

• 02/18/01 OT: Poker?
  

Ariel Biener

• 02/23/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  

Aviva Garrett

• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Basil Kruglov

• 02/07/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

Ben Beuchler

• 02/03/01 Re: BIND 9 vs djbdns
  

Berger, Gary

• 02/26/01 Circuit Database
  
• 02/21/01 RE: RE: Monitoring/Trending Software --
  
• 02/21/01 RE: Monitoring/Trending Software -- Whic
  

Bill Fumerola

• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

bill manning

• 02/25/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/07/01 draft-ops-ip-config-management-reqmnts-0
  

Bill Nickless

• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Bill Woodcock

• 02/25/01 Re: IXs
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Re[2]: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/04/01 Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS
  
• 02/03/01 Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

bimhoff

• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

bmanning

• 02/16/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/16/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/07/01 Re: Managing task lists
  
• 02/04/01 Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS
  
• 02/03/01 genetic diversity w/ DNS
  

Bora Akyol

• 02/27/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/19/01 Re: MPLS and VLAN info
  

Brad

• 02/22/01 RE: Access Control
  

Brad Verd

• 02/16/01 gTLD Informational Message
  

Bradley Dunn

• 02/06/01 Re: California Seizes Power Contracts
  

Bradley J. Passwaters

• 02/17/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Brandon Ross

• 02/22/01 RE: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

BrandonButterworth

• 02/01/01 Re: Not a good day now stuff from here i
  

Brent Sweeny

• 02/15/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Brett Frankenberger

• 02/12/01 Re: Access to .com, .net, and .org zone
  

Brett L. Hawn

• 02/13/01 RE: Using unallocated address space
  

Brian

• 02/06/01 Re: California Seizes Power Contracts
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

Brian Wallingford

• 02/28/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Bryan Bradsby

• 02/04/01 Re: FBI InfraGuard program
  

Bryan S. Blank

• 02/19/01 Re: port 2340?
  

CARL P HIRSCH

• 02/23/01 Re:Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/21/01 Re:RE: Monitoring/Trending Software -- W
  

Carter, Gregory

• 02/01/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Cerqua, Toby

• 02/07/01 Sweating the small stuff [was Re: Micros
  

Charles Scott

• 02/22/01 Re: DS3 Ordering Experiences
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 T3 Latency
  
• 02/16/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Charles Sprickman

• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/05/01 Re: PhoenixDSL/Telocity/Megapath
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Not a good day now stuff from here i
  

Chris Cappuccio

• 02/24/01 Re: OOPS...
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  

Chris Davis

• 02/23/01 RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 rfc 1918?
  

Chris Hallman

• 02/27/01 RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/27/01 RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  

Chris Kilbourn

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Chris Kleban

• 02/23/01 RE: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  
• 02/23/01 RE: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  
• 02/15/01 RE: cablemodems and voip
  

Christian Kuhtz

• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Christian Nielsen

• 02/27/01 Re: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Questi
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/14/01 Re: www.networksolutions.com off the air
  
• 02/14/01 Re: BGP deployment and peering questions
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

Christopher Ambler

• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Clayton Fiske

• 02/24/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  

Correll, Matthew

• 02/14/01 Juniper M series/Cisco GSR comparison
  

Craig A. Haney

• 02/23/01 Re: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  

Craig A. Huegen

• 02/11/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/11/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/10/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/10/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/10/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Craig Holland

• 02/12/01 RE: Need help with Cisco VLAN bridging..
  
• 02/09/01 Need help with Cisco VLAN bridging....
  

Craig Partridge

• 02/23/01 Re: History of private peering and excha
  

Craig Pierantozzi

• 02/25/01 Re: DS3 Ordering Experiences
  

Curt Rask

• 02/19/01 Network for Sale
  

Curtis Maurand

• 02/07/01 Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS
  
• 02/07/01 Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS
  

Dan Ellis

• 02/18/01 Looking for a RIM 857/957 Cradle at Nano
  

Dan Hollis

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/12/01 smtp virus traffic
  

Dan Streufert

• 02/20/01 Minimum globally routable address space?
  

Daniel Golding

• 02/28/01 RE: Next NANOG
  
• 02/27/01 RE: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Questi
  
• 02/26/01 RE: Next NANOG
  
• 02/25/01 RE: IXs
  
• 02/19/01 RE: Network for Sale
  

Daniel L. Golding

• 02/23/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 RE: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/14/01 Re: BGP deployment and peering questions
  
• 02/13/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/13/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Daniel Roesen

• 02/12/01 Re: Access to .com, .net, and .org zone
  

Daniel Senie

• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Danny McPherson

• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

Danny Snyder

• 02/01/01 RE: More 6509 problems...
  
• 02/01/01 RE: More 6509 problems...
  

Dave 'Duke of URL' Weiner

• 02/03/01 BIND 9 vs djbdns
  

dave o'leary

• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 RE: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/14/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Dave Snodgrass

• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

David Charlap

• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  

David Diaz

• 02/22/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

David Hares

• 02/20/01 AT&T ATM Outage
  

David Lesher

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Big Brother fights back
  
• 02/20/01 Big Brother fights back
  
• 02/17/01 Re: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/17/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/14/01 Re: OSU finally plans to fix their open
  

David Schwartz

• 02/28/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  

davids

• 02/22/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

Dee McKinney

• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

deeann mikula

• 02/17/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/04/01 Re: FBI InfraGuard program
  

Deepak Jain

• 02/27/01 RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: IXs
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/12/01 Access to .com, .net, and .org zone file
  

Derek J. Balling

• 02/27/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

Devon True

• 02/10/01 Recap: Software to track IP Address
  
• 02/05/01 Software to Track IP Address Assignment
  

Douglas A. Dever

• 02/21/01 (OT) Re: Beer and Gear and Merit
  

dsm

• 02/02/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

elble

• 02/19/01 Re: port 2340?
  
• 02/19/01 port 2340?
  

Elric

• 02/01/01 Re: Wierd portscans
  

Eric A. Hall

• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/17/01 Re: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

Eric Gauthier

• 02/23/01 Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  

Eric Germann

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/18/01 Fwd: Network Solutions sells its databas
  

Eric Sobocinski

• 02/14/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Etaoin Shrdlu

• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Fletcher E Kittredge

• 02/18/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Frank Jimenez

• 02/07/01 Re: network equipment vendors and social
  

Gilbert Pajela

• 02/07/01 RE: Managing task lists
  

Greg A. Woods

• 02/23/01 RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/04/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/19/01 dDos preventation startups
  
• 02/18/01 Fwd: RE: Global routing table bloat
  
• 02/18/01 Re: The Cidr Report
  
• 02/18/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/16/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/15/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/10/01 Re: Billing systems
  
• 02/07/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/07/01 Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/04/01 Re: The Cidr Report
  

Havard Eidnes

• 02/05/01 Re: How common is lack of DNS server div
  

Henry R. Linneweh

• 02/06/01 California Seizes Power Contracts
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Network Solutions Bilking ex-custome
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Not a good day now stuff from here i
  

Howard C. Berkowitz

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/23/01 RE: History of private peering and excha
  
• 02/23/01 Re: History of private peering and excha
  
• 02/23/01 History of private peering and exchanges
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Hugh Irvine

• 02/06/01 Re: Software to Track IP Address Assignm
  

Irwin Lazar

• 02/23/01 RE: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  
• 02/23/01 RE: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  
• 02/19/01 RE: MPLS and VLAN info
  

J Bacher

• 02/23/01 Re:Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

J.D. Falk

• 02/09/01 Re: Billing systems
  
• 02/07/01 Re: Managing task lists
  
• 02/05/01 Re: upstream scanning - upstream filteri
  

Jade E. Deane

• 02/12/01 non-operational - TACACS+/Cisco Secure A
  

James Aldridge

• 02/07/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

James R Grinter

• 02/27/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  

James S. Smith

• 02/07/01 Managing task lists
  

Jamie --gavroche

• 02/08/01 Re: [[email protected]: Re: Social respons
  

jamie rishaw

• 02/04/01 BIND, djbdns, etc - ^Z. suspend. fini. k
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 BIND, djbdns, commercialization
  
• 02/03/01 nanog nazi-ism
  
• 02/02/01 Re: More MSFT woes.
  

Jared Mauch

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  

Jason Ackley

• 02/14/01 Re: Test on Cisco 720xVXR NSE-1
  

Jason Blakey

• 02/23/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  

Jason Lewis

• 02/22/01 RE: Big Brother fights back
  
• 02/05/01 RE: PhoenixDSL/Telocity/Megapath
  
• 02/01/01 Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
  

Jason Lixfeld

• 02/28/01 RE: CANIX contact
  
• 02/20/01 RE: Network for Sale
  
• 02/05/01 Videotron peering contact
  

Jason Slagle

• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Jay

• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Delicious Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/08/01 Trace Sites
  

Jeff Frost

• 02/14/01 Re: www.networksolutions.com off the air
  
• 02/14/01 www.networksolutions.com off the air tod
  

Jeff Mcadams

• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/02/01 More MSFT woes.
  

Jeff Ogden

• 02/23/01 Re: History of private peering and excha
  
• 02/21/01 Re: (OT) Re: Beer and Gear and Merit
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Jeff Workman

• 02/07/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Jeffrey Burgan

• 02/28/01 CANIX contact
  

Jeffrey C. Ollie

• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Jeffrey Haas

• 02/23/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  

Jeffrey Meltzer

• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Jeremy T. Bouse

• 02/02/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  

Jerry Scharf

• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  

Jesper Skriver

• 02/25/01 Re: OOPS...
  
• 02/11/01 Re: GigE link between 6500 and GSR
  
• 02/11/01 Re: GigE link between 6500 and GSR
  

jfielding

• 02/13/01 Abovenet BGP upgrade problems
  

Jim Duncan

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  

Jim Mercer

• 02/06/01 savvis peering?
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

Jim Pepin

• 02/25/01 Re: IXs
  

Jim Shankland

• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918
  

Jimmy Kyriannis

• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  

jlewis

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Joe Abley

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  

Joe Arnstein

• 02/21/01 e-mail delivery problems
  

Joe Blanchard

• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  

Joe Budion

• 02/22/01 DS3 Ordering Experiences
  

Joe McGuckin

• 02/21/01 Re[2]: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Joe Provo

• 02/27/01 Re: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Questi
  
• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/12/01 Re: GigE link between 6500 and GSR
  

Joe Rhett

• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: BIND 9 vs djbdns
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Joe Shaw

• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  

Joel Jaeggli

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/10/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  

John Butler

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

John Curran

• 02/16/01 RE: happy bday IGS-R
  

John Fraizer

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/24/01 Re: OOPS...
  
• 02/24/01 OOPS...
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Re:Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Re[2]: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/14/01 OSU finally plans to fix their open rela
  
• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/08/01 Re: Social responsibility (censorship?)
  
• 02/08/01 Re: Social responsibility (censorship?)
  
• 02/08/01 Re: [[email protected]: Re: Social respons
  
• 02/08/01 RE: Social responsibility (censorship?)
  
• 02/07/01 Social responsibility (censorship?) on N
  
• 02/07/01 OT: test
  
• 02/01/01 Bind 8.2 Remote-shell Exploit is actuall
  

John Hawkinson

• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  

John Kristoff

• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/20/01 Re: RED deployment testing
  
• 02/17/01 re: RED deployment testing
  
• 02/17/01 RED deployment testing
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/10/01 Re: Source Route Bridging / Source Route
  

John M . Brown

• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

John Payne

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/15/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/12/01 Re: Access to .com, .net, and .org zone
  
• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

John R Levine

• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

John R. Levine

• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

John Starta

• 02/20/01 Re: Monitoring/Trending Software -- Whic
  
• 02/16/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Jon Stanley

• 02/25/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

Jonathan Disher

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  

Joseph McDonald

• 02/25/01 RE: IXs
  
• 02/10/01 RE: Billing systems
  

Joseph T. Klein

• 02/23/01 Re: History of private peering and excha
  

Josh Richards

• 02/25/01 Re: IXs
  
• 02/25/01 IXs
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Beer and Gear (Last one by me)
  
• 02/14/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

Joshua Goodall

• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

k claffy

• 02/15/01 Re: BGP deployment and peering questions
  
• 02/15/01 [CoralReef 3.4.1 released to public]
  
• 02/13/01 minor update to caida reverse traceroute
  
• 02/06/01 a bit dated, but forgot to post metrics
  

Kai Schlichting

• 02/27/01 Re: All your NIC handles are belong to u
  

Karyn Ulriksen

• 02/07/01 RE: Microsoft woes redux???
  
• 02/02/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

ken harris.

• 02/03/01 Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS
  

Ken Woods

• 02/21/01 OT: Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Kenneth D. Paquette

• 02/21/01 Sample CISCO Border Router Config
  

Kent Yu

• 02/10/01 Re: Need help with Cisco VLAN bridging..
  

Kevin Day

• 02/28/01 Seattle Earthquake
  

Kevin Facinelli

• 02/23/01 Re: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  

Kevin Oberman

• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Kevin_Badeen

• 02/16/01 Lan connectivity loss
  

Lane Patterson

• 02/22/01 Nanog-21 people flow analysis
  

Lee Watterworth

• 02/23/01 BGP filters for rfc 1918 and other nasti
  
• 02/20/01 Monitoring/Trending Software -- Which Pa
  

Leo Bicknell

• 02/20/01 Re: Peering contract, needed or optional
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Upgrade season
  
• 02/14/01 Re: [bgp-stats] Routing Table Report (fw
  

lucifer

• 02/07/01 Re: Managing task lists
  

Lucy E. Lynch

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

M. David Leonard

• 02/17/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/07/01 Microsoft woes redux???
  

Majdi S. Abbas

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Abovenet BGP upgrade problems
  
• 02/03/01 Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization
  
• 02/03/01 Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization
  

Marc Slemko

• 02/13/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Mark Borchers

• 02/23/01 RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/21/01 RE: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 RE: Sample CISCO Border Router Config
  

Mark Radabaugh

• 02/26/01 RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/22/01 RE: [NANOG] RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/21/01 RE: Access Control
  

Marshall Eubanks

• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/14/01 Re: Cingular Wireless drops below 99.999
  

Martin Cooper

• 02/15/01 Juniper M series/Cisco GSR comparison
  

Martin Hannigan

• 02/23/01 Re: DS3 Ordering Experiences
  
• 02/22/01 Re: DS3 Ordering Experiences
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear (Last one by me)
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/20/01 Re: any idea how to reach a human at the
  
• 02/17/01 Re: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/15/01 Re: NANOG
  
• 02/15/01 NANOG
  
• 02/14/01 RE: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/07/01 Re: Managing task lists
  

Martin, Christian

• 02/27/01 RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/16/01 RE: happy bday IGS-R
  

Mathew Butler

• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/23/01 RE: rfc 1918 (why filtering is a good id
  
• 02/19/01 RE: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/03/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Matt Levine

• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  

Matt Zimmerman

• 02/28/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  
• 02/26/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  

Matthew F. Ringel

• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  

Matthew Schlegel

• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/23/01 RE: reverse Traceroute
  

Matthew Zito

• 02/19/01 Re: NetSol Bulk Whois
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Quasi-operational re. Exim
  

mdevney

• 02/27/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  
• 02/24/01 Re: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  
• 02/24/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  
• 02/24/01 Re: DS3 Ordering Experiences
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Little survey: What do people use to
  
• 02/03/01 Vixie doing his part to make people upgr
  
• 02/02/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  
• 02/01/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Michael C . Wu

• 02/19/01 Re: OT-NoOp - Kobe Steak anyone?
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Billing systems
  
• 02/08/01 Re: Hinet.net/Asia-Taiwan outage?
  
• 02/08/01 Hinet.net/Asia-Taiwan outage?
  

Michael Kim

• 02/14/01 Test on Cisco 720xVXR NSE-1
  
• 02/11/01 Re: GigE link between 6500 and GSR
  
• 02/11/01 Re: GigE link between 6500 and GSR
  
• 02/11/01 GigE link between 6500 and GSR
  

Michael Long

• 02/19/01 MPLS and VLAN info
  

michael thomas guldan

• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  

Miguel A.L. Paraz

• 02/14/01 Re: Using unallocated address space - fo
  
• 02/14/01 Re: Using unallocated address space - fo
  

Miguel Mata-Cardona

• 02/15/01 cablemodems and voip
  

Mikael Abrahamsson

• 02/05/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  

Mike Gibbs

• 02/16/01 NANOG meeting and the XFL
  

mike harrison

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/24/01 RE: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Billing systems
  

Mike Hughes

• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

Mike Johnson

• 02/01/01 Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS
  

Mike Lewinski

• 02/19/01 Re: Delicious Network for Sale
  

Miles Fidelman

• 02/23/01 Re: History of private peering and excha
  
• 02/20/01 any idea how to reach a human at the .us
  
• 02/14/01 Re: www.networksolutions.com off the air
  
• 02/06/01 Re: California Seizes Power Contracts
  

Miller, Scott

• 02/27/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  

Mr. James W. Laferriere

• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Muljawan Hendrianto

• 02/01/01 Re: Scalable Mail solution with NAS
  

Nathan Stratton

• 02/22/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 RE: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 RE: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

Neil J. McRae

• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Upgrade season
  

Nicholas Bastin

• 02/18/01 NetSol Bulk Whois
  

Nipper, Arnold

• 02/19/01 Re: port 2340?
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  

Omachonu Ogali

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/02/01 XO Routing Issues in Maryland
  

Owen DeLong

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Patrick Greenwell

• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Paul A Vixie

• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Paul Bradford

• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  

Paul Lantinga

• 02/15/01 RE: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/14/01 happy bday IGS-R
  

Paul Schultz

• 02/27/01 RE: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Questi
  
• 02/20/01 RE: Minimum globally routable address sp
  

Paul Vixie

• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/07/01 Re: Managing task lists
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

pbergman

• 02/22/01 reverse Traceroute
  

Pete Ehlke

• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

Pete Kruckenberg

• 02/26/01 Next NANOG
  

Philip Smith

• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  

Philippe Strauss

• 02/22/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/21/01 [[email protected]: Re: Network for S
  

Pim van Riezen

• 02/22/01 duh (Re: [NANOG] Re: RE: rfc 1918?)
  
• 02/22/01 Re: [NANOG] RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: rfc 1918
  
• 02/09/01 Anything special with 172.31.0.0/24?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/02/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why
  
• 02/02/01 Re: [NANOG] RE: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why
  
• 02/02/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

poptix

• 02/03/01 Re: Operate until failure
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Network Solutions Bilking ex-custome
  

Przemyslaw Karwasiecki

• 02/21/01 RE: Network for Sale
  

Pyda Srisuresh

• 02/13/01 BGP deployment and peering questions
  

Rancken

• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  

Randy Bush

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/27/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Re[2]: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/10/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/07/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/07/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/05/01 Re: How common is lack of DNS server div
  
• 02/05/01 Re: How common is lack of DNS server div
  

ren

• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/25/01 Re: IXs
  

Rich Sena

• 02/25/01 Re: IXs
  
• 02/22/01 rfc-1918 has been godwin'd please stop t
  
• 02/22/01 A new thread...
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Richard A. Steenbergen

• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/07/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 /24's run amuck?
  

Richard Welty

• 02/19/01 RE: NetSol Bulk Whois
  
• 02/17/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 RE: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/15/01 RE: BGP deployment and peering questions
  

richb

• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Rick Smith

• 02/06/01 RTR with a Cisco router
  

rkuhljr

• 02/11/01 Re:Re: GigE link between 6500 and GSR
  
• 02/03/01 Re:BIND, djbdns, commercialization
  

Robbie Harrell

• 02/09/01 Billing systems
  

Robert L. Harris

• 02/05/01 Re: PhoenixDSL/Telocity/Megapath
  
• 02/05/01 Re: PhoenixDSL/Telocity/Megapath
  
• 02/05/01 Re: PhoenixDSL/Telocity/Megapath
  
• 02/05/01 PhoenixDSL/Telocity/Megapath
  

Rodney Caston

• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

Rodney Dunn

• 02/03/01 Re: More 6509 problems...
  
• 02/01/01 Re: More 6509 problems...
  
• 02/01/01 Re: More 6509 problems...
  

Rodney Joffe

• 02/17/01 Re: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  

Roeland Meyer

• 02/28/01 Covad SUCKS!
  
• 02/07/01 RE: Managing task lists
  
• 02/07/01 RE: Managing task lists
  
• 02/05/01 RE: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/04/01 FBI InfraGuard program
  
• 02/04/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/04/01 RE: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/03/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 RE: nanog nazi-ism
  
• 02/02/01 RE: [NANOG] RE: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why
  
• 02/02/01 RE: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

Roger Marquis

• 02/05/01 Re: upstream scanning - upstream filteri
  

Roisman, Dani

• 02/12/01 BGP Question followup - packet fragmenta
  
• 02/10/01 RE: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/09/01 BGP Question - how do work around pighea
  

Roland Dobbins

• 02/17/01 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  

Ron Buchalski

• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  

Roy

• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/14/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Billing systems
  

Russell Briggs

• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/20/01 Is this list still working?
  

Ryan O'Connell

• 02/15/01 Re: BGP deployment and peering questions
  
• 02/15/01 Re: BGP deployment and peering questions
  
• 02/14/01 Re: BGP deployment and peering questions
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Need help with Cisco VLAN bridging..
  

Sam Thomas

• 02/23/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  

Scott Baldwin

• 02/28/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Monitoring/Trending Software -- Whic
  

Scott Call

• 02/18/01 Kobe Steak
  
• 02/18/01 OT-NoOp - Kobe Steak anyone?
  

Scott Francis

• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  

Scott Patterson

• 02/22/01 RE: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 RE: Network for Sale
  

Scott Walker

• 02/23/01 Re: Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/23/01 Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/23/01 Re: home.nl NOC contact number.
  
• 02/23/01 Re: home.nl NOC contact number.
  
• 02/23/01 home.nl NOC contact number.
  

Sean Donelan

• 02/28/01 DOE Review of Criticality Accidents
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/26/01 It was documented (Re: Warning: Cisco RW
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/25/01 Outage: South Dakota - Qwest/USwest
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Peering contract, needed or optional
  
• 02/16/01 Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Digging in warm climates
  
• 02/16/01 Digging in warm climates
  
• 02/15/01 Upgrade season
  
• 02/15/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/14/01 Re: Using unallocated address space - fo
  
• 02/14/01 RE: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/13/01 Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/11/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/11/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/10/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/09/01 Dotted lines on carriers maps
  
• 02/09/01 outages as confidential information
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/06/01 DDOS meeting
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/04/01 Re: genetic diversity w/ DNS
  
• 02/04/01 Speakers circuit, upcoming Internet secu
  
• 02/03/01 Preferential notice of new versions
  
• 02/02/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  
• 02/01/01 Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't b
  

Shawn McMahon

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/27/01 Re: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Questi
  
• 02/27/01 Re: 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Questi
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Update for noc .nl problem..
  
• 02/23/01 Re: home.nl NOC contact number.
  
• 02/23/01 Re: reverse Traceroute
  
• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 [[email protected]: ScanMail Message:
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: RE: Monitoring/Trending Software --
  

Simon Leinen

• 02/27/01 64.0.0.0/8 etc. [was: Re: BGP Question -
  

Simon Lockhart

• 02/25/01 Re: IXs
  
• 02/12/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/09/01 Re: Cisco Flash help needed
  
• 02/08/01 Cisco Flash help needed
  

Simon Lyall

• 02/26/01 Fw: Re: Warning: Cisco RW community back
  
• 02/26/01 Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor.
  

Simon Waters

• 02/02/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

SMcGrath

• 02/27/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/23/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/07/01 On fiber cuts in Charleston SC
  
• 02/07/01 Re: Managing task lists
  
• 02/07/01 Is there a fiber cut in the Charleston,
  

smd

• 02/15/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/14/01 Re: Juniper M series/Cisco GSR compariso
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/11/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Smerdon, John D

• 02/13/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Smith, Rick

• 02/21/01 Access Control
  

Spencer.Wood

• 02/23/01 AT&T ATM Outage This Week
  

Stephen Griffin

• 02/26/01 Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor
  
• 02/13/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/10/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  
• 02/10/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Stephen J. Wilcox

• 02/24/01 Re: OOPS...
  
• 02/23/01 RE: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/13/01 Re: Using unallocated address space
  
• 02/05/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  

Stephen Sprunk

• 02/12/01 Re: BGP Question - how do work around pi
  

Stephen Stuart

• 02/24/01 Re: OOPS...
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/20/01 uRPF enhancement
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/01/01 Re: sorry to ruin several of your evenin
  

Steve Bellovin

• 02/09/01 news story about the fiber cut off China
  

Steve Gibbard

• 02/28/01 Re: Covad SUCKS!
  

Steve Goldstein

• 02/09/01 Taiwan--seed.net and TAnet2.net work...R
  

Steve Meuse

• 02/16/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Steve Rubin

• 02/04/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  

Steve Smith

• 02/21/01 RE: Sample CISCO Border Router Config
  

Steve Sobol

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/23/01 Re: DS3 Ordering Experiences
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/17/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/17/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/17/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/05/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  
• 02/03/01 Re: Vixie doing his part to make people
  
• 02/02/01 Quasi-operational re. Exim
  

steve wolff

• 02/15/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Steven J. Sobol

• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Delicious Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/14/01 Re: OSU finally plans to fix their open
  
• 02/08/01 Re: Social responsibility (censorship?)
  

Steven M. Bellovin

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/14/01 Re: Using unallocated address space - fo
  
• 02/08/01 Re: Social responsibility (censorship?)
  

Susan Harris

• 02/08/01 Draft Atlanta agenda
  

Suzanne Woolf

• 02/27/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

Sykes, Phil

• 02/21/01 Re: Re:RE: Monitoring/Trending Software
  

tc

• 02/07/01 Re: Microsoft woes redux???
  

Thomas Kernen

• 02/28/01 Re: Next NANOG
  

Tim Winders

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  

Timothy Brown

• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

Tony Bates

• 02/24/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/17/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/12/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/09/01 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/02/01 The Cidr Report
  

Tony Hain

• 02/28/01 FYI : Seattle Earthquake
  

Tony Tauber

• 02/14/01 Re: www.networksolutions.com off the air
  

Travis Pugh

• 02/16/01 Re: Systemic problems at Verizon
  
• 02/14/01 [bgp-stats] Routing Table Report (fwd)
  

Troy Corbin

• 02/20/01 re: Network for sale
  
• 02/20/01 Re: Network for Sale
  
• 02/19/01 Re: Network for Sale
  

Troy Davis

• 02/20/01 Re: Minimum globally routable address sp
  

Ukyo Kuonji

• 02/27/01 Re: All your NIC handles are belong to u
  
• 02/22/01 Beer and Gear (Last one by me)
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Beer and Gear surprise
  

Ulf Zimmermann

• 02/02/01 Little survey: What do people use to bac
  
• 02/02/01 Re: More 6509 problems...
  

Vadim Antonov

• 02/07/01 network equipment vendors and social res
  

Valdis.Kletnieks

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: rfc 1918?
  
• 02/22/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/21/01 Re: Sample CISCO Border Router Config
  
• 02/07/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  
• 02/04/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Vijay Gill

• 02/21/01 Re: Beer and Gear surprise
  
• 02/17/01 Re: 'Old wine in new bottles.'
  
• 02/06/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

Vivien M.

• 02/03/01 RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

Walter Prue

• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/15/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/15/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  

Wayne Bouchard

• 02/28/01 Re: Seattle Earthquake
  
• 02/26/01 Re: Next NANOG
  
• 02/23/01 Re: Choosing a Service/Hosting Provider
  
• 02/17/01 Re: T3 Latency
  
• 02/16/01 Re: happy bday IGS-R
  
• 02/01/01 Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgrade
  

William Allen Simpson

• 02/08/01 Re: FC: More on how FCC and Congress wil
  
• 02/08/01 Re: /24's run amuck?
  

Wilson, David

• 02/28/01 RE: Seattle Earthquake
  

Wojtek Zlobicki

• 02/12/01 Re: Access to .com, .net, and .org zone
  
• 02/10/01 Source Route Bridging / Source Route Tra
  

Wolfgang Tremmel

• 02/20/01 Peering contract, needed or optional?
  

Yonkerbonk

• 02/10/01 Re: Need help with Cisco VLAN bridging..
  

Yusuf Goolamabbas

• 02/21/01 General timeline for addition of records
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month