|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Using unallocated address space
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:31:52PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > At 22:56 12/02/01 -0800, Sean Donelan wrote: > > >On Mon, 12 February 2001, John Fraizer wrote: > > > Any time a network is caught announcing non-allocated address space, the > > > registry should bill them accordingly. If they refuse to pay, the > > > registry should yank their ASN. That would be strong encouragement to do > > > the right thing. > > > >Other than making it difficult for people to figure out WHOIS using that > >ASN, "yanking" an ASN's registration has little practical effect. You > >can use an un-allocated ASN almost as easily as using an un-allocated > >address block. > > The registries, ARIN/RIPE/APNIC should announce the offending block could someone please explain the benefit of turning the registries into internet police forces? i really don't understand how this could *realistically* solve this problem, and i can imagine plenty of ways that this could become a bigger problem in itself > themselves and shunt it to null0. If the offender announces a /18 then > they should announce theirs as 2x/19s and thereby override the bogus /18. > and the offending party will announce 32 /23s.. what will this solve? regards, michael -- e: [email protected] c: +1.614.260.6716 u: www.ele-mental.org Wir fahr'n fahr'n fahr'n auf der Autobahn
|