|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Next NANOG
There were about 650 registered for the last one. I'm not sure how many showed up. Network stats indicated that over 400 individual DHCP addresses were in use at any one time. The problem is meeting room size, and the concept of multiple tracks. Is there enough material to have multiple tracks? Is it desirable at all? It has seemed to work well for the tutorials. Might be an interesting experiment for the next NANOG. Daniel L. Golding [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Christian Nielsen Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:27 PM To: Rodney Caston Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Next NANOG On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Rodney Caston wrote: > Vegas would be nice :) which allow Nanog to allow more people to go. Has there been talk about allowing more then 500 to attend? > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > > > > > > > TBA - which from what I heard means there's a probable but not firm yet... > > > > joelja > > > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Pete Kruckenberg wrote: > > > > > > > > Was the date/place of the next NANOG announced in Atlanta? > > > > > > Pete. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Joel Jaeggli [email protected] > > Academic User Services [email protected] > > PGP Key Fingerprint: 1DE9 8FCA 51FB 4195 B42A 9C32 A30D 121E > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > It is clear that the arm of criticism cannot replace the criticism of > > arms. Karl Marx -- Introduction to the critique of Hegel's Philosophy of > > the right, 1843. > > > > > > > > > >
|