North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Adam Rothschild wrote: > I'm a bit confused. Under this arrangement, what incentive is there > for security-conscious common people to run BIND as a name server, > rather than its various alternatives, most of which don't require > preferential treatment in order to get timely security > advisories/fixes? Let's say you get your patches from Sun, right? Sun gets information on those patches from ISC, and releases them to you without preferential treatment. Just because you aren't aware of it, don't assume that software vendors don't have private channels of communication with their providers. Think before you speak. -- Joe Rhett Chief Technology Officer [email protected] ISite Services, Inc. PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/
|