North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: rfc 1918?
> > There are good reasons to want to get those packets (traceroutes from > > people who have numbered their networks in rfc1918 networks, f'rinstance). > > The original note specifically showed them as being TCP packets from > a 10.x.x.x address going to port 80. Does that qualify as a good reason? Err, no, but I don't think it's reasonable to expect people to filter rfc1918 packets based on specific protocols. > > Not everyone agrees whether it is better to filter or not to filter, > > but there are good arguments on both sides. > > Does anybody in the house think that these packets actually have a snowball's > chance in Hades of getting a reply back sucessfully? No, but that's really a thoroughly orthogonal question. --jhawk
|