North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Greg A. Woods wrote: > So far as I saw 8.2.2-P7 logged all of these errors and so could have > given you ample time to fix up all of the problems just like it did for > me. In an ideal world, I agree with you. The base of all of this discussion was how it can be that so many people take a while upgrading bind. I think the situation I ran into is a realistic real world scenario. Understaffed organizations will run into their own walls pretty easily when trying to tackle the upgrade. > [snip serving borken zones is bad] I am near to agreeing with you if it were about not picking up a zone-change when the zonefile has turned bogus. However, the effect of a zone no longer being authoritative on the primary is not really what I'd define as fun either :). > Unfortunately BIND has never come with the equivalent of a GNU "NEWS" > file to mention explicitly all of the user-visible differences and with > all new releases it sometimes a bit of an adventure to discover all the > new features and any incompatibilities. Voila, I think that this is what my problem was. Like I said, the information _was_ out there, it was just not intuitively available. So the upgrade will scare some people off, if they don't manage to find it. Cheers, Pi
|