|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Update for noc .nl problem..
They wouldn't even consider that.. They said email [email protected] and wait for a response... Which is all good for spam, etc.. but something like what happened to us.. a 24 hour response could be too much.. Quoting J Bacher <[email protected]>: > > At 03:22 PM 2/23/01 +0000, you wrote: > > >I'm curious - how many ISPs hold to this kind of policy of being tight-lipped > >until subpoenaed? > > > >Personally, I'm kind of glad to see this response from @home. I know I would > >want to see an ISP I used do the same thing if confronted by The Law. Maybe > >that's just the Bill of Rights lover in me. > > > >Having said that, it sucks that they're forcing you to get the lawyers and the > >cops involved. I'd often prefer to see things handled on an informal basis of > >professional courtesy. Especially when real damage is done such as in your > >case. > > We follow the same policy of not handing out client information without a > legally binding document requiring us to do so. > > However, we do use our AUP to prevent further access if we have sufficient > -evidence- of a violation. A severe violation may result in access being > removed first while we conduct an internal investigation to determine the > extent of the violation that took place. > > Providing client information is only useful for civil or criminal > charges. What the individual under attack needs is access revoked and, for > that need, we respond immediately. > -- Scott Walker [email protected] Cell 954.444.3408 http://www.unspeakable.org Network/Security Administrator Court Room Quotes Q: "Mr. Slatery, you went on a rather elaborate honeymoon, didn't you?" A: "I went to Europe, Sir" Q: "And you took your new wife?"
|