Beginning February 01 2000
Messages: 686
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

Adam McKenna

• 02/20/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

adrian

• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Adrian Chadd

• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Alex Bligh

• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/22/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Blech!
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Blech!
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Fair Queuing combats DDoS? [was Re:
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Fair Queuing combats DDoS? [was Re:
  
• 02/10/00 Fair Queuing combats DDoS? [was Re: Yaho
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Congestion or regression testing DDo
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/19/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/19/00 NSI/Whois broke, for the 2093802nd time
  
• 02/19/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/04/00 Re: Verio applies for trademark on the t
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Andrea Abrahamsen (Di Lecce)

• 02/17/00 Abuse Contact in ARIN Database (question
  

Andrew Bender

• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Andrew Brown

• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Andrew Partan

• 02/14/00 Re: ARIN Database
  

Andy McConnell

• 02/22/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  

Barry Shein

• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Basil Kruglov

• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Bill Woodcock

• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/01/00 Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: De
  

Bino Gopal

• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  

Bjorn Carlsson

• 02/11/00 Re: Does Anyone Care?
  

bmanning

• 02/22/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/19/00 Re: Divergence Between NSI And Registry
  
• 02/04/00 Verio applies for trademark on the term
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Bohdan Tashchuk

• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  

Bora Akyol

• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Brad

• 02/19/00 whois broke again?
  

Brandon Ross

• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

BrandonButterworth

• 02/14/00 Re: ARIN Database
  

Brett D. Watson

• 02/10/00 The SANS Institute: SANS NewsBites Vol.
  

brett watson

• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Brian Dickson

• 02/11/00 Re: Does Anyone Care?
  

Brian Wallingford

• 02/24/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Bruce Campbell

• 02/13/00 Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL
  

Bryan Bradsby

• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/02/00 Re: early warning mailing list?
  

Bryan C. Andregg

• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Charles Sprickman

• 02/10/00 Re: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/08/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  

Charley Kline

• 02/10/00 RE: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Chip Sharp

• 02/23/00 CALEA & Electronic Surveillance of packe
  

Chris Adams

• 02/13/00 Re: Blech!
  

Chris Brenton

• 02/26/00 Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] TOOLS FOR VANDALS
  

Chris Cappuccio

• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Christian Nielsen

• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  
• 02/08/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/04/00 Re: junk fax
  
• 02/04/00 Re: Verio applies for trademark on the t
  

Christopher B. Zydel

• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Craig A. Huegen

• 02/13/00 Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-pa
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  

Craig Labovitz

• 02/07/00 RE: Audio Quality
  

Dan Hollis

• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/02/00 early warning mailing list?
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Dana Hudes

• 02/22/00 Re: TOS history?
  
• 02/22/00 enough already on SNV
  
• 02/22/00 TOS history?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/17/00 Re: private RFC-1918 addresses on public
  

Daniel Hagerty

• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  

Daniel Senie

• 02/18/00 Re: alternatives to private RFC-1918 add
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/07/00 Re: Audio Quality
  

danielle v

• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  

Danny McPherson

• 02/22/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Strange announcements
  

Dave Bergum

• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Dave Cooper

• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  

Dave Crocker

• 02/06/00 Re: junk fax
  

Dave Curado

• 02/27/00 Re: Need routing engineer from Verio
  

dave o'leary

• 02/03/00 Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: De
  

David Bird

• 02/21/00 yahoo, again?
  

David Brouda

• 02/07/00 RE: Audio Quality
  
• 02/07/00 Audio Quality
  

David Diaz

• 02/27/00 RE: Need routing engineer from Verio
  
• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  

David Kennedy CISSP

• 02/06/00 Reminder: BOF on Distributed DoS, San Jo
  

David Lesher

• 02/15/00 Re: Now this upsets me, irregardless of
  
• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Compromised boxes
  

Declan McCullagh

• 02/10/00 Re: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/10/00 Re: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/07/00 Yahoo offline because of attack (was: Ya
  
• 02/07/00 Re: Yahoo network outage
  
• 02/07/00 Yahoo network outage
  

Deepak Jain

• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/21/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/20/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Blech!
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

DeepBlue

• 02/02/00 SERVER NAMES
  

Derek J. Balling

• 02/04/00 RE: junk fax
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Dirk Harms-Merbitz

• 02/20/00 SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/06/00 Re: www.netscape.com
  
• 02/05/00 www.netscape.com
  

dklindt

• 02/10/00 Re: Compromised boxes
  

Dmitry Safronov

• 02/28/00 To AOL engineers (icq services)
  

Douglas Denault

• 02/28/00 RE: Need routing engineer from Verio
  

Ehud Gavron

• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/20/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for
  

Eric A. Hall

• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  

Eric Germann

• 02/13/00 NANOG List SW and Y2K
  
• 02/07/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Eric Kozowski

• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Faisal Jawdat

• 02/11/00 marketing consultants to the rescue
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

foo

• 02/09/00 Data Center design.
  

Forrest W. Christian

• 02/28/00 Re: POC details for peers/NAPs/NOCs (was
  
• 02/24/00 Re: DDOS Roadmap from SANS...
  
• 02/18/00 Re: Robustness principle considered harm
  
• 02/18/00 Re: private RFC-1918 addresses on public
  
• 02/15/00 Re: !white.house, !panacea, new tracebac
  
• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 Re: early warning mailing list?
  

Garlic

• 02/13/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  

Gentzler, Eric

• 02/07/00 RE: Yahoo network outage
  

George Herbert

• 02/10/00 DDos apparently not http related
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/04/00 Re: Superbowl success?
  

Greg A. Woods

• 02/18/00 Re: private RFC-1918 addresses on public
  

Gregory A. Carter

• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

grisha

• 02/21/00 RE: whois broke again?
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/10/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: MAE-East Problems?
  

Havard.Eidnes

• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Henry Kilmer

• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Henry R. Linneweh

• 02/29/00 Re: Retracing Sender's SMTP IP Address u
  
• 02/24/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois and the internet broke again?
  
• 02/15/00 Re: Clinton fights hackers, with a hacke
  
• 02/15/00 Clinton fights hackers, with a hacker
  
• 02/15/00 Re: DoS (Denial of Service) Attack resou
  
• 02/15/00 Now this upsets me, irregardless of the
  
• 02/14/00 Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL
  
• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for
  
• 02/12/00 Winds Of Change Must Come Now
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Howard C. Berkowitz

• 02/28/00 Re: POC details for peers/NAPs/NOCs (was
  
• 02/01/00 Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: De
  
• 02/01/00 Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: De
  

I Am Not An Isp

• 02/21/00 Re: Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (O
  
• 02/21/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/20/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/20/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/19/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/19/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/08/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/07/00 Re: DNS problem at NANOG18
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

J.D. Falk

• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/20/00 Re: Funk *that* (was Re: whois broke aga
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Congestion or regression testing DDo
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

James Smith

• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Jamie Rishaw

• 02/28/00 Re: POC details for peers/NAPs/NOCs (was
  
• 02/28/00 Re: Need routing engineer from Verio
  

Jared Mauch

• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 etrade+zdnet reported attacks
  

Jeff Kell

• 02/29/00 Re: show interface switch
  

Jeff Mcadams

• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  

Jeff Ogden

• 02/24/00 government eavesdropping
  

Jeff Weisberg

• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Jeffrey Meltzer

• 02/05/00 Re: www.netscape.com
  

Jesper Skriver

• 02/20/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/09/00 Re: MAE-East Problems?
  

Jim Mercer

• 02/24/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/13/00 Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Jim Williams

• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

jlewis

• 02/21/00 Re: Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (O
  
• 02/20/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Compromised boxes
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/08/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

jmalcolm

• 02/21/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Joe McGuckin

• 02/11/00 laptop AC cord lost at NANOG
  

Joe Shaw

• 02/15/00 Re: Now this upsets me, irregardless of
  
• 02/10/00 Re: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/10/00 Re: identifying ASN
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/10/00 Re: [Re: Which Part(s) Failed in the rec
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/10/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Which Part(s) Failed in the recent D
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/04/00 Re: Verio applies for trademark on the t
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Joel Jaeggli

• 02/21/00 Forgot to forward this to the list: stat
  

John Hawkinson

• 02/26/00 Re: APC MasterSwitches, lock up on DOS a
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/15/00 Re: !white.house, !panacea, new tracebac
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/07/00 Re: Simple? Question...
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

john heasley

• 02/27/00 Re: Need routing engineer from Verio
  

John M. Brown

• 02/25/00 APC MasterSwitches, lock up on DOS attac
  
• 02/20/00 missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/19/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/19/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/19/00 More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-al
  
• 02/18/00 and we worry about route table bloat wit
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

John Payne

• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

John R. Levine

• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/13/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  

John R. Sosebee

• 02/18/00 interesting breakdown .
  

Johnny Eriksson

• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  

Josh Richards

• 02/24/00 Re: and we worry about route table bloat
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for
  

Joshua D. McKay

• 02/11/00 trinoo (ns.c/master.c)
  

k claffy

• 02/14/00 !white.house, !panacea, new traceback pa
  

K. Graham

• 02/08/00 RE: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Kai Schlichting

• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Compromised boxes
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/07/00 RealMedia feed down since 3:15 ?
  
• 02/07/00 nanog media recordings ?
  
• 02/07/00 Re: Yahoo network outage
  

ken.woods

• 02/02/00 Request for Assistance
  

Kevin Day

• 02/19/00 Re: whois broke again?
  

Kevin McElearney

• 02/07/00 RE: RR.COM has backbone problems
  

Kim Hubbard

• 02/10/00 ASO mailing list announcement/reminder
  

Larry Snyder

• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  
• 02/21/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/10/00 C Source for RE: FBI / NIPC released a D
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/04/00 Re: Verio applies for trademark on the t
  

Lauren F. Nowlin

• 02/28/00 POC details for peers/NAPs/NOCs (was Re:
  
• 02/02/00 NoOp: NANOG, boating, art galleries, rav
  

Leonard, Jason M.

• 02/20/00 RE: Funk *that* (was Re: whois broke aga
  
• 02/20/00 Funk *that* (was Re: whois broke again?)
  

Lionel Lauer

• 02/12/00 Generic filtering policies (was Re: Make
  

lucifer

• 02/10/00 Sample box (more info)
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Majdi Abbas

• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Majdi S. Abbas

• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Marc Slemko

• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Mark E. Mallett

• 02/10/00 Re: identifying ASN
  

Mark Kent

• 02/10/00 identifying ASN
  

Mark Milhollan

• 02/26/00 Re: APC MasterSwitches, lock up on DOS a
  
• 02/14/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Mark Moore

• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Mark Prior

• 02/13/00 Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-pa
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing atta
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing atta
  

Mark Radabaugh - Amplex

• 02/21/00 UUNet problems in Chicago?
  

Marsh, Jerry

• 02/10/00 FW: identifying ASN
  

Martin Cooper

• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  

Matthew R. Potter

• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  
• 02/10/00 Re:FBI / NIPC ... Correction
  

Member Services

• 02/23/00 ARIN-V
  

Michael C. Toren

• 02/19/00 Re: NSI/Whois broke, for the 2093802nd t
  

Michael Shields

• 02/21/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/21/00 Re: NYT on Internet traffic reporting
  
• 02/21/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/07/00 Re: DNS problem at NANOG18
  

michael.dillon

• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Fair Queuing combats DDoS? [was Re:
  
• 02/07/00 Re: Worldcom and Qwest switch places
  

Mike Bird

• 02/13/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/10/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  

Mike Hughes

• 02/28/00 Re: POC details for peers/NAPs/NOCs (was
  

Mike Tancsa

• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  

mpotter

• 02/10/00 Re:FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detection
  

Mr. James W. Laferriere

• 02/21/00 Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (OT)
  
• 02/20/00 RE: whois broke again?
  

NANOG Mailing List

• 02/22/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/19/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Fair Queuing combats DDoS? [was Re:
  
• 02/10/00 RE: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/08/00 Re: MAE-East Problems?
  
• 02/08/00 MAE-East Problems?
  
• 02/07/00 Simple? Question...
  

Neil J. McRae

• 02/23/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Strange announcements for www.cisco.com
  
• 02/07/00 Re: RR.COM has backbone problems
  

Owen DeLong

• 02/07/00 Re: DNS problem at NANOG18
  
• 02/07/00 Re: DNS problem at NANOG18
  

Pam Ciesla

• 02/11/00 Found Cell Phone at NANOG 18
  

Pat Myrto

• 02/10/00 Re: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  

Patrick Evans

• 02/10/00 RE: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Patrick Greenwell

• 02/22/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/03/00 RE: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Paul Ferguson

• 02/28/00 Re: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercep
  
• 02/28/00 RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercep
  
• 02/28/00 RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercep
  
• 02/28/00 [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs
  
• 02/24/00 Re: TOS history?
  
• 02/24/00 Re: DDOS Roadmap from SANS...
  
• 02/23/00 Re: CALEA & Electronic Surveillance of p
  
• 02/23/00 Re: CALEA & Electronic Surveillance of p
  
• 02/15/00 Fwd: Protocol Action: Network Ingress Fi
  
• 02/14/00 DoS (Denial of Service) Attack resource
  
• 02/14/00 Fwd: Last Call: Security Expectations fo
  
• 02/14/00 Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-pa
  
• 02/14/00 RE: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-pa
  
• 02/13/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/13/00 RE: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-pa
  
• 02/12/00 RE: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-pa
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-pa
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing atta
  
• 02/11/00 Blech!
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing atta
  
• 02/11/00 [fwd] Lawyers Forsee Denial Of Service S
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 [fwd] SANS Security Technology Leadershi
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/08/00 NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm..
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/07/00 An addition...
  

Paul Thornton

• 02/08/00 Re: multicast stream
  
• 02/08/00 multicast stream
  

Paul Vixie

• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  

Rachel Luxemburg

• 02/21/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/02/00 NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Ramin Sepehr Rad

• 02/10/00 Re: identifying ASN
  

Randy Bush

• 02/28/00 RE: Need routing engineer from Verio
  
• 02/27/00 RE: Need routing engineer from Verio
  
• 02/27/00 Re: Need routing engineer from Verio
  
• 02/24/00 [IOZ] SDN/Telkom - details for Summit TV
  
• 02/23/00 Re: CALEA & Electronic Surveillance of p
  
• 02/22/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  
• 02/18/00 Re: and we worry about route table bloat
  
• 02/15/00 Re: DoS (Denial of Service) Attack resou
  
• 02/13/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/13/00 Re: Blech!
  
• 02/12/00 Re: Blech!
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Fair Queuing combats DDoS? [was Re:
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/04/00 junk fax
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Richard Irving

• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again? (Cannot configure
  
• 02/07/00 Re: Yahoo network outage
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/03/00 Re: Request for Assistance
  

Richard Jimmerson

• 02/12/00 ARIN Database
  

Richard Steenbergen

• 02/28/00 Re: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercep
  
• 02/28/00 Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlo
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: [Re: Which Part(s) Failed in the rec
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/10/00 Re: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/09/00 Re: [Re: Which Part(s) Failed in the rec
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Rizzo, Mark

• 02/27/00 RE: Need routing engineer from Verio
  
• 02/27/00 Need routing engineer from Verio
  

robert

• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Robert Cannon

• 02/24/00 Congress to Hold Hearings on DOS Attacks
  
• 02/08/00 RE: junk fax
  

Robert E. Seastrom

• 02/08/00 Re: MAE-East Problems?
  

Rodney Caston

• 02/21/00 Re: Test Message
  
• 02/10/00 FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detection to
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 Info on the DoS attacks.
  

Rodney Joffe

• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/15/00 Re: GeekTools SuperWhois V3.0 is up...
  
• 02/15/00 GeekTools SuperWhois V3.0 is up...
  
• 02/14/00 Nanog musical video tribute
  

Roeland M.J. Meyer

• 02/24/00 RE: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/22/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/20/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 RE: whois broke again?
  
• 02/10/00 RE: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/08/00 RE: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/04/00 RE: junk fax
  
• 02/04/00 RE: Superbowl success?
  
• 02/03/00 RE: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Ron Buchalski

• 02/21/00 Re: Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (O
  
• 02/13/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/08/00 RE: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Ron da Silva

• 02/06/00 Re: www.netscape.com
  

Ronan Mullally

• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Rubens Kuhl Jr.

• 02/28/00 RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercep
  
• 02/28/00 DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercept vs NetFlow
  

Ryan Tucker

• 02/10/00 Re: identifying ASN
  
• 02/10/00 RE: FBI / NIPC released a DDoSD detectio
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Sam Thomas

• 02/12/00 Re: Blech!
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for
  
• 02/08/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

scarter

• 02/15/00 Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL
  

scott w

• 02/04/00 Re: Superbowl success?
  

Scott W Brim

• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Sean Donelan

• 02/26/00 Congestion strikes British Telecom
  
• 02/23/00 Gold ribbon for Internet security
  
• 02/22/00 Power Outage Study Team
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 Fire: South Korea Financial District
  
• 02/21/00 NYT on Internet traffic reporting
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/15/00 Re: Now this upsets me, irregardless of
  
• 02/15/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/15/00 Re: Last Call: Security Expectations for
  
• 02/15/00 It could've been worse (was Re: DoS (Den
  
• 02/13/00 What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/12/00 POWER OUTAGE: Palo Alto California
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Cisco says attacks are due to operationa
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Data Center design.
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/09/00 IRR/RADB (was Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Compromised boxes
  
• 02/09/00 Congestion or regression testing DDoS
  
• 02/08/00 Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/05/00 Worldcom and Qwest switch places
  
• 02/04/00 Superbowl success?
  
• 02/03/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 Re: early warning mailing list?
  
• 02/01/00 Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: De
  

Sehmel, William C.

• 02/21/00 Re: yahoo, again?
  
• 02/17/00 FWD >New Tool for DDoS Defense
  

Shawn McMahon

• 02/25/00 Fwd: [cfgeeks] TOOLS FOR VANDALS
  
• 02/14/00 Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL
  
• 02/13/00 Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Microsoft search gone?
  

Shawn Morris

• 02/11/00 RE: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Simon Lockhart

• 02/08/00 Microsoft search gone?
  

Simon Lyall

• 02/11/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Stephen Sprunk

• 02/22/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/21/00 Re: missing commands in Cisco IOS
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Steve Dispensa

• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  

Steve Rubin

• 02/19/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  

Steve Sobol

• 02/29/00 Re: Retracing Sender's SMTP IP Address u
  
• 02/29/00 Re: POC details for peers/NAPs/NOCs (was
  
• 02/21/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/18/00 Re: interesting breakdown .
  
• 02/16/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/15/00 Re: Clinton fights hackers, with a hacke
  
• 02/15/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/15/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/12/00 Re: [fwd] Lawyers Forsee Denial Of Servi
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/07/00 Re: RR.COM has backbone problems
  
• 02/07/00 Re: RR.COM has backbone problems
  
• 02/04/00 Re: junk fax
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 Re: SERVER NAMES
  
• 02/02/00 Re: NON-OP RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Sykes, Phil

• 02/09/00 RE: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

takei

• 02/07/00 DNS problem at NANOG18
  

Tim Salo

• 02/21/00 RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  

Todd Romero

• 02/08/00 Re: Microsoft search gone?
  

Tom

• 02/14/00 DoS Attack Tracking Tool?
  

Tom Beeson

• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  

Tony Bates

• 02/25/00 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/18/00 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/11/00 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/04/00 The Cidr Report
  

Toplez Razer

• 02/29/00 Retracing Sender's SMTP IP Address using
  
• 02/11/00 Re: [RE: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW
  
• 02/11/00 Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all
  
• 02/09/00 Re: [Re: Which Part(s) Failed in the rec
  
• 02/09/00 Which Part(s) Failed in the recent DOS A
  

trall

• 02/12/00 Cisco - ip verify unicast reverse-path
  

Travis Pugh

• 02/09/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

Troy Davis

• 02/11/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  

TTSG

• 02/27/00 Re: Need routing engineer from Verio
  
• 02/02/00 Re: early warning mailing list?
  

Ulf Zimmermann

• 02/22/00 Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micr
  

Vadim Antonov

• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/09/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/08/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/07/00 RR.COM has backbone problems
  

Valdis.Kletnieks

• 02/29/00 Re: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercep
  
• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/24/00 Re: DDOS Roadmap from SANS...
  
• 02/24/00 DDOS Roadmap from SANS...
  
• 02/20/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/20/00 Re: SMTP in distributed DOS
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: Funk *that* (was Re: whois broke aga
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/16/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  

Vijay Gill

• 02/28/00 RE: [long] Re: DDoS: CAR vs TCP-Intercep
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing atta
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing atta
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

Ville

• 02/25/00 DDoS/PPark (was: Re: government eavesdro
  

Vincenzo Jon - IL

• 02/21/00 RE: UUNet problems in Chicago?
  
• 02/21/00 RE: Test message....problem solved!
  
• 02/21/00 Test Message
  

Wayne Bouchard

• 02/14/00 Re: What would you tell the White House?
  
• 02/11/00 Re: Cisco says attacks are due to operat
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Info on the DoS attacks.
  
• 02/10/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmm
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo offline because of attack (was
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  
• 02/10/00 Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned
  

William Allen Simpson

• 02/29/00 Re: show interface switch
  
• 02/25/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/24/00 Re: government eavesdropping
  
• 02/22/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/22/00 Re: TOS history?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke ag
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/21/00 Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Re: whois broke again?
  
• 02/20/00 Sharing and Cooperation (was Re: whois b
  
• 02/20/00 whois-servers.net
  
• 02/18/00 alternatives to private RFC-1918 address
  
• 02/17/00 private RFC-1918 addresses on public rou
  

ww

• 02/29/00 show interface switch
  

York, Tracy (CEI-Atlanta)

• 02/03/00 RE: SERVER NAMES
  

Yu Ning

• 02/21/00 Issue on establishing local/private IRR
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month