North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: TOS history?

  • From: William Allen Simpson
  • Date: Tue Feb 22 08:41:09 2000 
Dana Hudes wrote:
> 
> Was this something actually supported in the Internet? Widely? any examples of who?
> Around when did it stop being supported?
> Did anyone ever actually support RFC1349 in a host or router?
>
Yes, on the half-dozen or so routers that I worked on, the low delay bit 
was supported.  This was especially important for dial-up links.
(NetBlazer, Lan'sEnd, etc., none of which are in much use today.)

I have also _set_ the low delay bit for telnet traffic on those boxen,
but you don't telnet out of routers very often.

I'd have to check the source, but I'm pretty sure I put at least some 
of that stuff in Qualcomm/Sony cell phones and base stations, so it 
might still be in use today.

I have also used the TOS bits in a weighted fair queuing scheme.

I never figured out how "high reliability" would be implemented.  I just 
tried to never have low reliability. :-)

[email protected]
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32