North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: SMTP in distributed DOS

  • From: I Am Not An Isp
  • Date: Sun Feb 20 16:33:04 2000


At 04:07 PM 2/20/00 -0500, [email protected] wrote:

>Correct. But the person said we *should* bounce back to the originating IP
>address, which is what's logged in the Received: header. My point was that
>if we *did* what he suggested, *his* mail would quite possibly be broken
>by taking the action. I've seen a number of mail packages (PP from the
>ISODE comes to mind, but there's others) that refused to accept mail if
>they couldn't verify at message submission time that they'd be able to send
>back a bounce message. I'm not saying that's correct EITHER, just that
>there's sites that do that.

Sorry, guess I misread the original post.

I thought he was just sending it to a random hostname in the received headers, not in the from field.

Oh, well, just goes to show you cannot trust someone without enable! :)


> Valdis Kletnieks

TTFN,
patrick

--
I Am Not An Isp - www.ianai.net
ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
"Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle
(Enable? We dunt need no stinkin' enable!!)