|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: MAE-East Problems?
Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it. I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE. On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Adam Rothschild wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a bit confused here. You're reporting 20% packet loss, and then > pasted ping output indicating zero packet loss. What's the dilly? > > -adam > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:38:19PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote: > > > > > > Is anyone else having problems with packet-loss through MAE-EAST? We're > > down 20% to MAE-E and I'm almost certain it is as result of packet-loss. > > > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it. > > > > core1-Col>en > > Password: > > core1-Col#term length 20 > > core1-Col#ping > > Protocol [ip]: > > Target IP address: vie1 > > Translating "vie1"...domain server (206.183.224.8) [OK] > > > > Repeat count [5]: 250 > > Datagram size [100]: > > Timeout in seconds [2]: > > Extended commands [n]: > > Sweep range of sizes [n]: > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Sending 250, 100-byte ICMP Echoes to 206.183.226.36, timeout is 2 seconds: > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Success rate is 100 percent (250/250), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/36 > > ms > > > > > > John Fraizer > > EnterZone, Inc > > >
|