North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Collocation Access
On Dec 28, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Leo Vegoda wrote:
Time for a colocation reality check. Why would facilities need to have tight security? Lets count off the reasons...On Dec 28, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Joe Abley wrote: [...]Indeed. I'm surprised the market hasn't produced facilities with better thought through and executed security and access controls. Is there not enough competition in each metro area for anything other than lowest common denominator?
- Federally mandated - For some government and gov contractor work, there are high security requirements. There are a few data centers, run by defense contractors, that cater to this sector. It is highly specialized.
- Customer demand for higher security - In light of the lack of security issues that we've encountered so far, most customers are unwilling to pay anything more for higher security.
- Need for colocation facilities to differentiate themselves - Right now, having available power and cooling is differentiation enough. For those who haven't noticed, its a very "tight" colocation market - demand growth exceeds supply growth overall, and in several areas (London, Chicago) there is effectively no available high quality carrier neutral colocation. Given this, why beef up security, which will eat into colocation provider margins?
What constitutes tougher security anyway?
- Armed guards?
- Outside facility video surveillance? (as well as inside), more careful reception of incoming hardware (explosive swabs, anyone?),
- Mandated biometric authentication? (yes, we have hand geometry readers, but their use isn't mandated for all),
The current fetish for ID checking is "security as theatre" rather than true security. However, some aspects of the colocation experience ARE, in fact, perceptual. Neon, cool mantraps, snap glass, anyone?
Until supply catches up to demand, only price and power will matter to most folks, along with an acceptable level of facility redundancy (Tier III for most).
- Daniel Golding