|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:37:32AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > here i quibble. i don't really like either reflectors or route servers. > let's ignore route servers. :-) > so, rather than do the rr thing, which is labor intensive and a dead end in > the long run, just jump to routers that can handle it, like small 36xx (or > 26xx if they have the ram, i really don't know that end of your products > well). Many small providers aren't very good at filtering their routes in the first place. Sloppiness in a mini-nap is expected. One person with a little clue and a route server can make _everyones_ lives easier in such a situation. Scaling routers is relatively easy. Scaling clue is harder. :-) (Note that I wont disagree that in such a situation, full-mesh peering is a very viable option.) > randy -- Jeffrey Haas - Merit RSng project - [email protected]
|