North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: BBN Peering issues
At 12:10 PM 19980813 -0700, Robert Bowman wrote: >I am referring to output of Exodus traffic relative to input of BBN traffic, >not vice versa. Exodus consumes very little of BBN's output (Exodus input). >Isn't that the "supposed" problem? Our private exchange statistics show it >very simply, if BBN disconnects, it will drop our traffic by 1.85%. I cannot >speak for certain about BBN's traffic input as an aggregate, that is why >I stated below that we are estimating. >> >off. Let's face the facts, BBN is only 1.85% of my traffic. By all accounts, >> >we estimate to be in the area of 10-30% of their traffic. Lots of luck. We >> >actually see a massively inverted benefit scale in this particular situation. It seems intuitively reasonable to me that 1.85% of Exodus input comes from BBN. No arguments there. I would like to know where the "By all accounts, we estimate to be in the area of 10-30% of their traffic." sentence comes from. Are you suggesting that 10-30% of BBN's total output goes to Exodus? Or that 10-30% of Exodus output goes to BBN? The first scenario is ridiculous. The second scenario is possible, but I would suspect it is closer to 10% than 30%. -dsr- ...Still not speaking for the company...
|