Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster

• From: Mark Newton
• Date: Tue Oct 14 16:09:14 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Just wondering: what if we gave ipv6 traffic "mucho priority" over ipv4
traffic, then tell our user communities that ipv6 provides a better
quality network experience, including (hopefully) faster page loads, &
lower video game pings?

I think by the time we've put carrier NATs everywhere the users will
notice that all by themselves, and we won't need to tell them anything.

• References:
  • spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster Scott Doty

• Prev by Date: Re: Cisco interface - GB of transfer software
• Next by Date: Re: spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical