North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: mail operators list
On 10/30/07, Andy Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 30 Oct 2007, at 16:21, Daniel Senie wrote: > > > At 12:07 PM 10/30/2007, Al Iverson wrote: > >> On 10/30/07, chuck goolsbee <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On a more relevant and operational sort of note, it sure would be > >> > nice if there were a NAMOG (North American Mail Operators Group) or > >> > the like to resolve these sorts of issues. Feel free to clue-by- > >> four > >> > me if I've missed it. > >> MAAWG come pretty close: http://www.maawg.org/home > > Smaller/regional ISPs need not apply. Minimum cost of entry is > > $3,000/year, no voting rights ($12.5K if you actually care about > > voting). So if you're not Verizon or Comcast or similarly sized, it > > appears you're not really welcome. > > Though it might make sense to discuss some other things NANOG could > > do in addition to worrying about routing table size and churn in > > the core, those are all discussions for the Futures list. > > I would support the creation of a mail-operators list (& agenda time > for a mailops bof, since a lot of networks are small enough to mean > that netops and sysops are often the same guys) if it's deemed to be > offtopic on nanog-l. I have a sinking fear it'll be overrun with loud people who aren't actually responsible for anything more than a single IP at most, like SPAM-L, but I suppose it's worth a shot. Al Iverson -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
|