North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: mail operators list
Well, the current nanog MLC is mostly because Susan Harris was cracking down equally on discussions of anything mail / spam filtering related (operational not kooky) .. in fact, on anything that didnt involve pushing packets from A to B. And we have Marty Hannigan from the MLC telling us that operational mail / spam filtering issues are perfectly on topic. New list not particularly necessary I think .. but sure, a spam or mailops bof at nanog would be a good idea. I (or well, APCAUCE) have been running a spam conference track at APRICOT for the past few years now .. srs On Oct 30, 2007 11:02 PM, Al Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would support the creation of a mail-operators list (& agenda time > > for a mailops bof, since a lot of networks are small enough to mean > > that netops and sysops are often the same guys) if it's deemed to be > > offtopic on nanog-l. > > I have a sinking fear it'll be overrun with loud people who aren't > actually responsible for anything more than a single IP at most, like > SPAM-L, but I suppose it's worth a shot.