North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Apple Airport Extreme IPv6 problems?

  • From: Martin Hannigan
  • Date: Sat Sep 15 15:25:27 2007
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qGsvqVsd7dh5z0kgOzkLNrVmEFQZ4/obs6c17r4YhG8=; b=GCe5oxo2gJF21qv2oQHuGd3lhoYwmDFxOIzuqVQypvRklgIxf1uuDncURiD153d0UorWZ5W0iNUpuD5uOyHs4+ZzWyTydEXpe1VN/UNkp2lAYl+cq3cV1ogapFIRv0+so2Vvb2/r3HK8z0NHwb1F5GWul94buFjk7PGD3UcZZaY=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eo9yF3V4l+qNxyvryl7ige+FexW6KHT14i5MvDblIA+/w8Qq3vSYXpmlmxcmlxFG8S2cyVgWW/iz7unKw0/WNi0RpBqB/OKbc8FXPw7Gg6FuJFIa9ZOnewsLqGsF1PGpqt7MNs/c5LmlrqOXyC4qzALGlB7xJbR/yYeoDpRvRbQ=

On 9/15/07, Barrett Lyon <[email protected]> wrote:

[ snip ]

> We removed AAAA on our production hosts shortly after we deployed it,
> our global v6 deployment goes production next week, at which time I
> may re-add the AAAA to limited production.  If we do this, I publish
> a report of the stats once I have more accurate figures.

How did you do the naming? Matching AAAA or unique?

I have no idea what to expect over time with behavior on matching AAAA
and A since I have no idea what to expect with v6 since we don't
really have any standard deployment plans or even de-facto standards
in place to move forward. Is there any de-facto or otherwise standard
around host schemes for dual stack?