North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Anyone else seeing latency through SJC2.ALTER.NET?
- From: William Schultz
- Date: Mon Oct 09 18:15:01 2006
I've spoke to MCI, which is our hand off... They say things are okay
now (as of about 15 minutes ago). Problem was caused by "high
utilization", unknown what device.
Are you still seeing latency? I've got that circuit shut down so I'm
blind.
-Wil
On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Jonathan Claybaugh wrote:
Wil,
My traffic enters Alternet in LAX (but not SJC). I've been seeing
a great deal of latency and packet loss through LAX1<->SEA1 for the
last few hours.
The problem seemed to spike about 20 minutes ago.
Cheers
-Jonathan
via Alternet.William Schultz wrote:
5 0.so-1-0-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (157.130.203.17) 2.173 ms
2.419 ms 2.228 ms
6 127.ATM4-0.XR1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.202) 287.247 ms
287.482 ms 287.548 ms
7 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.137) 287.316 ms
287.743 ms 288.016 ms
5 0.so-5-1-0.GW6.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.54.169) 1.998 ms
1.918 ms 0.so-1-0-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (157.130.203.17) 1.606 ms
6 0.so-0-3-0.XL1.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.174) 289.389 ms
293.047 ms 127.ATM4-0.XR2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.206) 294.331 ms
7 0.so-1-0-0.XL2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.141) 294.862 ms
0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SCL2.ALTER.NET (152.63.54.134) 3.410 ms
0.so-1-0-0.XL2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.141) 295.108 ms
4 63.66.208.1 (63.66.208.1) 2.200 ms 2.143 ms 1.299 ms
5 0.so-1-1-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (157.130.203.13) 274.324 ms
273.923 ms 273.909 ms
6 127.ATM5-0.XR2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.198) 1.973 ms
2.476 ms 2.431 ms
7 0.so-1-0-0.XL2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.141) 274.125 ms
274.027 ms 274.190 ms
-Wil
|