North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs
On 2/10/06, Alain Hebert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its the other 20% which is buggin the hell of our clients... > (Mostly New spam format and the dynamic spam with generated images) > Try a few of the cheaper tricks - HELO checks, for example, or greetpause (I'd say graylisting but that has interesting consequences when it comes up against another "cool antispam trick" - sender address callbacks). They'll cut down on a ton of this stuff. AUPs etc are good but believing in the "be generous in what you accept" part of that old saw never got you anywhere... though a certain amount of generosity is called for all right. > Most ARIN ISP's also take it somewhat seriously (legal issues and > such)... Except for those big ones, big lawyers thrump reality/truth > anytime. Asiapac ISPs have a rather worse problem but well - theyre not the only ones. Like I said try maawg - the next one is later this month in SFO - www.maawg.org -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])
|