North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: shim6 vs nanog
On Oct 15, 2005, at 12:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:
The problem is... from what I've seen so far the operational requirements voice is a lonely one. If there are any network operators on this list who wouldn't qualify for PI space in an IPv6 world... do you really want your traffic engineering decisions made by individual end systems based on delay?there are some reasons why i'd rather have the discussion here...Not directly aimed at William: As others have said before (and I finally listened) PLEASE take this discussion to the shim6 list.