North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: NANOG Changes
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Gadi Evron wrote: > Perfect, but let's not repeat past mistakes. > > Let's set a date for this "temporary government" to expire, and start > discussing how the process of a more permanent "governing" body will be > achieved. I think 3 months is the longest we should decide on (not consider, > the NANOG community has enough considering to do), we can do it in a month. > > I believe this is important enough, either someone who has been here forever > steps forward and volunteers to get the emails of who people want to see at > this headache of a position, or we do it openly on the list. A poll can be > done later on. something has to be arbitrary in the absence of a government, its a chicken and egg. i think you're looking for problems that arent there - do you or anyone have issue with the progress thus far? if not the question is moot. Steve
|