North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Whitelisting, AOL E.mail etc.

  • From: Deepak Jain
  • Date: Fri Oct 24 20:41:38 2003

One point I'd like to mention is that most AOL antispam guys also have an
aol.net address. When AOL.COM has stopped accepting your mail, aol.net still
will. [Postmaster, for example].

Deepak Jain
AiNET

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
> Stephen J. Wilcox
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:28 PM
> To: Robert Mathews
> Cc: North American Network Operators
> Subject: Re: Whitelisting, AOL E.mail etc.
>
>
>
> This was presented at this weeks NANOG by AOL:
>
> http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/spam.html
>
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Robert Mathews wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > All:
> >
> > I have weighed the benefit of posting Vs. NOT posting this
> information to
> > NANOG.  I found that posting this note to the larger community was
> > important perhaps for two reasons.  They are:
> >
> > 1) The problems that we at the University of Hawai'i experienced from
> > 10/17 - 10/20 with AOL, effected a fairly large userbase.
> Therefore, I am
> > inclined to believe that someone who is at least partially
> responsible for
> > the operation or managment of another network similar to our own - could
> > benefit from having this information (I know of at least 2 other large
> > University systems that were effected by the same issue).
> >
> > 2) Having the requisite AOL contact information in any event - might be
> > important toward at least partially achieving a resolve to future
> > problems.
> >
> > Now, a brief recap.  Beginning the afternoon of the 17th (EDT),
> all E.mail
> > traffic from UH' namespace to AOL began to bounce.  This
> condition did not
> > resolve until the morning of the 20th (EDT).  Primarily, this was due to
> > AOL's whitelisting, and whitelisting policies.  Upon discovering this
> > problem, I began an inquiry into the condition.  We were
> informed that AOL
> > had received complaints from 'its members', who stated that our central
> > E.mail server was responsible for instances of spamming.
> >
> > Subsequently, AOL personnel and I were able to hold a dialog over the
> > weekend to resolve pertinent issues regarding the matter.  I
> wish to give
> > praise the AOL Team, who responded quickly, and were both
> cooperative and
> > sincere with respect to their desire to resolve issues.  I MUST credit
> > Carl Hutzler, Dir. of AntiSpam Operations at AOL, and Charles Stiles,
> > Manager of the Postmaster-Team at AOL especially, for their
> commitment to
> > resolve this issue expediently.  Traffic exchange between AOL
> and us have
> > been re-established.
> >
> > For your reference, I wish to present the following statement
> from Carl to
> > me, which may be helpful to you as well.
> >
> > 	"Anyone can request to receive the complaints that mail
> > 	transmitted from their IP space generated via a Complaint Feedback
> > 	Loop. All we need is:
> >
> > 	1. Address space (CIDR or otherwise)
> > 	2. Abuse email address where you want them sent
> >
> > 	We will send them in realtime as we get them with the entire
> > 	original spam included for your analysis. Feel free to have them
> > 	send this data to me and/or our abuse phone number for now ..."
> >
> > The relevant AOL contacts are as follows:
> >
> > Carl Hutzler
> > Director, AntiSpam Operations
> > America Online Mail Operations
> > [email protected]
> > 703.265.5521 work
> > 703.915.6862 cell
> > Carl Hutzler <[email protected]>
> >
> > or
> >
> > Charles Stiles <[email protected]>
> > Manager, Postmaster-Team - AOL
> >
> >
> > All my best,
> > Robert.
> > -------
> >
>
>
>