|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:03:07AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > For all top-level domains you can register a domain and not have any > name servers specified for it. In whois it'll say exactly that - > "no nameservers". Not correct, registrar and registry agreements require at least two name servers. > > I'd be very much against removing these domains from root zones entirely, > but I maybe biased since I use these zone files for my own software. The 'root zones' have nothing to do with what I'm talking about. > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote: > > > In a message written on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:05:17PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > If what they are doing is not ok, what would you propose? > > > > This is a bit of a sideways step, but... > > > > I'm sure a lot of people would like to be able to register a zone > > and not point it at any nameservers, and not even have it appear > > in the top level zone files. Many people "sit" on a zone for many > > reasons, and in most cases having to point them at a nameserver > > just to register it is pointless and stupid. > > > > If a domain could exist in that state, then these domains could > > just have the lame name servers removed from their records, possibly > > existing with no nameservers, until the owner pointed them at the > > right place. > > >
|