|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS
For all top-level domains you can register a domain and not have any name servers specified for it. In whois it'll say exactly that - "no nameservers". I'd be very much against removing these domains from root zones entirely, but I maybe biased since I use these zone files for my own software. On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:05:17PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > If what they are doing is not ok, what would you propose? > > This is a bit of a sideways step, but... > > I'm sure a lot of people would like to be able to register a zone > and not point it at any nameservers, and not even have it appear > in the top level zone files. Many people "sit" on a zone for many > reasons, and in most cases having to point them at a nameserver > just to register it is pointless and stupid. > > If a domain could exist in that state, then these domains could > just have the lame name servers removed from their records, possibly > existing with no nameservers, until the owner pointed them at the > right place. >
|