|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: classless delegation [Re: IP address fee??]
At 4:40 PM +0200 2002/09/06, Peter van Dijk wrote: Technically, nothing -- at least, with the absolute latest authoritative nameservers and the absolute latest recursive/caching nameservers, and it doesn't seem to give much problems to modern resolver libraries.I am doing separate zone files. Each IP delegated to me is a separate zone. Now, again, what is wrong with that? Procedurally, everything is wrong with it -- in part, because of the profusion of mis-configured authoritative and recursive/caching nameservers that exist on the Internet today (not to mention resolving libraries), the fact that most vendors today still ship vulnerable authoritative & recursive/caching nameservers with their OSes (and *no one* ships an OS that uses modern resolver libraries), and the fact that 99.999999% of the people on the 'net will take the default garbage that the vendor ships to them simply because they don't know any better. They are the ones associated with your NS records. At a procedural level, PTR records are mutually exclusive with SOA & NS records. Indeed, you found some things wrong with the /24 zone, but that was not the subject, and nothing you found wrong with the /24 is related to the /29. See above. -- Brad Knowles, <[email protected]> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
|