North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IP address fee??

  • From: Brad Knowles
  • Date: Fri Sep 06 08:37:28 2002
  • Reply-by: Wed, 1 Jan 1984 12:34:56 +0100
At 11:11 AM +0200 2002/09/06, Peter van Dijk wrote:


 And you can do it even easier without RFC2317:

http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-2317-delegation.html
Nope. Fundamentally broken. Delegations must occur at the apex of a zone.

Trying to take advantage of certain mis-features in current versions of BIND does not excuse you from being responsible for doing the job properly in the first place, because you can be assured that future versions of BIND will most likely fix this "feature".

--
Brad Knowles, <[email protected]>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)