|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: classless delegation [Re: IP address fee??]
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:56:09PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: [snip] > > I am doing separate zone files. Each IP delegated to me is a separate > > zone. Now, again, what is wrong with that? > > Technically, nothing -- at least, with the absolute latest > authoritative nameservers and the absolute latest recursive/caching > nameservers, and it doesn't seem to give much problems to modern > resolver libraries. > ['it will break with lots of software'] I am very willing to believe everything that you are saying, but *what part* of my configuration breaks those nameservers? > >> o The reverse zone contains one or more A records > >> The reverse domain "192.122.109.193.in-addr.arpa." contains one > >> or more A records. A records should only be placed in > >> forward-mapping domains. > > > > What A-records is it talking about? I am not seeing any. > > They are the ones associated with your NS records. At a > procedural level, PTR records are mutually exclusive with SOA & NS > records. But there are no A records in that zone. Again, what A-records? I have, by the way, enabled AXFR to the world for my reverse zones (all 16), so feel free to have a look. Also, I am aware that the hostmaster-address in the SOA for these zones is bogus - I will fix that shortly. Greetz, Peter -- [email protected] | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue
|