|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IP renumbering timeframe
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:10:58PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote: > > In a message written on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:27:49AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > I'd be mildly concerned that people would see "free IP blocks" and start > > using them even when not necessary. I think allocating them a /24 from > > this block only when they have demonstrated need, and don't have any other > > ARIN assigned blocks, would be far more efficient. > > Since the goal is to reduce paperwork, I'm not sure about 'demonstrated > need', but I could definately endorse "you get a /24 with your ASN if > and only if you have no other registry assigned space assigned to you". > I specifically exclude provider allocated space, as I'm assuming the ASN > goal is to multihome. Yes, "demonstrating" things to ARIN is remarkably annoying. Perhaps something along the lines of a /21 to /24 available just for being multihomed. If you qualify for more IP space, you have to give it back. -- Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
|