|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IP renumbering timeframe
In a message written on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> It would add 30% to the number of BGP address blocks pretty much automatically.
How do you come up with that number? Of course, we have an issue
with reclaiming existing space, but I think there are a number of
people who have /20's today who only need a /24. Also, only
allocated ASN's could anounce (what's that, 24k today?), and probably
half or more of those would choose not to use this /24. Why would
say, UUnet with /12's need a /24? So I'm thinking worst case this
might be 5-15k new routes, which is probably 3-13% of the total
space already announced.
--
Leo Bicknell - [email protected] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - [email protected], www.tmbg.org
|