|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron
Yeah, so why bother? As long as load balancers don't have GigE ports, I can't use them and have to use something like Resonate. Besides, LBs don't do site-site load balancing. If you want to do distributed load sharing then there really isn't much choice. Personally, I don't see benefits of LBs that proper clustering wont give you. Component clusters work well, much better than simple LB will give you. > From: tony bourke: Friday, July 07, 2000 8:01 AM > > you can do EtherChannel for more than 100 Mbps, but we all > know how well > that works. > > Tony > > On Fri, 7 Jul > 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote: > > > > > The last time I looked at one, I couldn't get it in > > GigE...100baseTX only. Ergo, I couldn't run it on my backbone. > > > > > Sutantyo, Danny: Thursday, July 06, 2000 8:37 AM > > > > > > How about Local Director? > > > > > > From: Richard Colella: Thursday, July 06, 2000 5:38 AM > > > > > > Products are also available from Alteon, Cisco (Distributed > > > Director) and Resonate. Last time I looked, none of these > > > products does everything one wants, IMHO, but the set union > > > of features comes pretty close.
|