Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't?

• From: Joe Maimon
• Date: Sun Nov 02 16:12:20 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:32 AM, Nelson Lai wrote:

Why do some companies like Cogent get depeered relatively often and companies like Teleglobe don't even get talked about and operate in silence free from depeering?

That's funny. One of the first networks to de-peer Cogent was Teleglobe. They re-peered after a bit.

The next obvious question is: When Sprint, Telia & L3 de-peering Cogent, it causes a lot of news in the press & noise on NANOG, so why didn't you know Teleglobe depeered Cogent?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Brandon Galbraith

• References:
  • Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Nelson Lai
  • Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Patrick W. Gilmore

• Prev by Date: Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage
• Next by Date: Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't?
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical