RE: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

• From: Martin Hannigan
• Date: Wed Jul 09 14:11:26 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

[ snip ]
 
> My point was really, how do we get dns-sec rolling? From the top-down
> that's 'bug icann' right? and from the bottom-up that's:


It's from the bottom up, not the top down, that might be most effective
here.

-M<

• References:
  • Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Buhrmaster, Gary
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning Christopher Morrow

• Prev by Date: Re: Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning
• Next by Date: Re: tacid.org
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical