North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: SMTP addresses in <>

  • From: Alexander Harrowell
  • Date: Fri Jan 04 13:08:30 2008
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=1ZPA406ktOyZmLdDLe5BTKYvzccixm3n5kbATdjX4DY=; b=BsoMNUeaSbEN88Bq5OU0Cv7SGyBBRPwR6I/pou7/8EuVaHMJxSlaHswZEyAZ0e5WivZ6c7vbJSiFijVIQJ6Wp6BGTn3BMb3tUcde0snnr/svIn4I++zSqv5GXrcoBTWSSDUUAT4WuaCxAjNUH5JLcpDvG2swWMdMt8oKLaT8wug=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=OaLKyLfkktHNfZcm4/jnUa4OleIcH2/8rIyzQYsbE1L0Oev4EVwNsuhjsS++8hm7rpwM+WRgbtvwVIO2XWrXUGllBVp+9N6naAEZxqNRXkHwDghxro0CfrjoMRPs0NbSq4WhHAkfsyiLvGOMOI3+9QEkpqDzGGFANQfZOSEk7xk=
On Jan 4, 2008 5:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:

I completely agree.  If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't
have an email problem at all.

A

Because....we wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide interoperability for a "notmail" system that insisted on strict validation...