North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel
Just for the purpose of clarification - it was not the NANOG list that our salesperson was using. However, because the gentleman who brought it to our attention cc'd NANOG - we apologized here as well. Again -- very sorry for the distraction this created. Kind regards, XXXXXXXX XXXXXX Director of Sales & Purchasing Choice Resale LLC 310.804.XXXX Voice 310.943.XXXX Fax [email protected] www.choiceresale.com AOL IM: XXXXXXXX -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Martin Hannigan Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 4:03 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: [ snip ] > --- [email protected] wrote: > From: David Ulevitch <[email protected]> > > Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their > email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to. [..and.. ] > You obviously haven't had the experiences that some have had with sales folks that use >this method. Some are like the little Chihuahua that won't quit trying to hump your leg. >No matter how many times you tell them you're not going to "do it" they keep trying. The AUP that we ( the NANOG MLC) presented to the "community" at NANOG 41, which seemed to have wide support, contained a new provision to deal with this problem. Hopefully, the "steering" committee will step up to the plate and approve soon. -M<
|