North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel

  • From: XXXXXXXX XXXXXX
  • Date: Sat Oct 27 11:24:53 2007

Just for the purpose of clarification - it was not the NANOG list that our
salesperson was using.  However, because the gentleman who brought it to our
attention cc'd NANOG - we apologized here as well.

Again -- very sorry for the distraction this created.

Kind regards,

XXXXXXXX XXXXXX
Director of Sales & Purchasing
Choice Resale LLC

310.804.XXXX  Voice
310.943.XXXX  Fax

[email protected]
www.choiceresale.com

AOL IM:  XXXXXXXX


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Martin Hannigan
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 4:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel



On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks <[email protected]> wrote:

[ snip ]

> --- [email protected] wrote:
> From: David Ulevitch <[email protected]>
>
> Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their
> email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to.

[..and.. ]

> You obviously haven't had the experiences that some have had with sales
folks that use >this method.  Some are like the little Chihuahua that won't
quit trying to hump your leg.  >No matter how many times you tell them
you're not going to "do it" they keep trying.



The AUP that we ( the NANOG MLC) presented to the "community" at NANOG
41, which seemed to have wide support,  contained a new provision to
deal with this problem.

Hopefully, the "steering" committee will step up to the plate and approve
soon.

-M<