North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel

  • From: Martin Hannigan
  • Date: Sat Oct 27 07:07:39 2007
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7ybRY7g61m0bkCsU8hwLWUodZhMX2ddj+gkxa2AB41g=; b=RtsSF098fjYbPS0Pq2b0pC9/1002FVTdTYTARZ/lnE8Sc5yKqRFUACzrqUgk4vHPxQLMz1+1qWpPp9nfFdUssUnGRnvFVMfX/yTfR+MVdChWHHju2oenre15QTb01rbAx3VPmrRooFQK0F73PBGhRJ2+SFO8AVs2B6cE3oITM9A=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jDFBpuXLbVHwKdO5rk28dmGywHZlQe0HT3KemtIoBzM1p4DC+j410uxcIlXGEm5aCV60BqLSniRbaPLOe5EDaPPTgNDn9J7cteUVihn0T7XdlQMYRvkT9clxuuYcK+WAqttwCUQZc3ARxYeM5P5WRK95VsWPTuJ73Gk3IgAn2kY=

On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks <[email protected]> wrote:

[ snip ]

> --- [email protected] wrote:
> From: David Ulevitch <[email protected]>
> Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their
> email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to.

[..and.. ]

> You obviously haven't had the experiences that some have had with sales folks that use >this method.  Some are like the little Chihuahua that won't quit trying to hump your leg.  >No matter how many times you tell them you're not going to "do it" they keep trying.

The AUP that we ( the NANOG MLC) presented to the "community" at NANOG
41, which seemed to have wide support,  contained a new provision to
deal with this problem.

Hopefully, the "steering" committee will step up to the plate and approve soon.