North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: 240/4

  • From: Florian Weimer
  • Date: Tue Oct 16 17:29:04 2007 
* Pekka Savola:

> Do we need to classify anything (yet)?
>
> I say the proof is in the pudding.  Once some major user decides
> they'll need 240/4 for something, they'll end up knocking their
> vendors' (probably dozens) and their own ops folks' doors.

If there's risk that we'll see end user assignments from 240/4 at any
time in the future, this certainly reduces the set of possible
experiments even further.  So I think it makes sense to designate part
of it as "private use, not subject to allocation" if anybody sees any
benefit from encouraging experimentation.