North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy...

  • From: Marshall Eubanks
  • Date: Tue Aug 14 09:26:02 2007



On Aug 14, 2007, at 3:50 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

- -- Marshall Eubanks <[email protected]> wrote:

On Aug 14, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:


I was just struck by a couple of statistics:


[snip]

In January 2007, according to PIR five registrars deleted 1,773,910
domain
names during the grace period and retained 10,862. That same month,
VeriSign reported that among top ten registrars, 95% of all
deleted .COM
and .Net domain names were the result of domain tasting.


So, if they charged a $ 1 "return fee," they would either

- produce revenues of several million USD per month (unlikely) or
- cut domain tasting by about 2 orders of magnitude.

... or both.


I think I could live with that, all things being equal.

- - ferg

It's not uncommon for companies to not charge good customers for minor incidental things, like fixing a
typo; I think that most would reconsider that policy if they were hit with 8 million "minor" changes in a
day, which it seems is where we are. That has to cost something.


I haven't heard a good reason why not to do this. If IANA can't use the money the IETF can.

Regards
Marshall


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)

wj8DBQFGwSaBq1pz9mNUZTMRAoxDAKCUZ8s/Q/tRF6NC0T7jC6SRFy1zVACgplR4
NZVluA1bG+T0JiZuZrsrVGQ=
=Ey48
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/