North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

  • From: Roland Dobbins
  • Date: Thu Mar 01 09:45:34 2007
  • Authentication-results: ind-dkim-1; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/inddkim1002 verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=719; t=1172759550; x=1173623550; c=relaxed/simple; s=inddkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Roland=20Dobbins=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Where=20are=20static=20bogon=20filters=20appropriate? =20was=3A=2096.2.0.0/16=20Bogons |Sender:=20; bh=s0mk00e5vgSeB1VDXw2ySl3u0R6f3+57/vE55QQHyNE=; b=abyRZuJiI9+5MzPTG2bmQTZwUR1rbSN40ensRHN991Fk+bU6lKK0JaR41c2wka+py/SY7EzV FMEu1yJuf4/xxRjoK/PvdnwvdLtosMmyh4EIMMHwVMAHiNx3qMsvyZtN;


On Mar 1, 2007, at 6:22 AM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:

So, where are static bogon filters appropriate?

#define static

Obviously, one's bogon filters (both for iACLs and for prefix-lists or whatever other mechanism one uses to filter the route announcements one accepts) must be dynamic enough in nature to accommodate updates when new blocks are cracked open. 'Static' shouldn't be read as 'eternal', although that's often what ends up happening.

;>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // 408.527.6376 voice

The telephone demands complete participation.

-- Marshall McLuhan