North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Best Email Time
- From: Alexander Harrowell
- Date: Sat Dec 09 14:05:10 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=YSdOYA8GAHb7ct4Oj69gCz/s+m2pLxmwolrdQRS6dJkXlQOXAjo0KtEPGKA0Kck6oaqqDjVZFilOYIJ481yKIuEozhsPZQyvnM3DSHocI3pE9JOyJA5XGJPfj2e5TAy3sSbtQUonTpACL748TBoD+pWQV7MxmFwJLh1QqiYMSF4=
This account sees something over 10x more spam than genuine traffic, almost all of which is autofiltered.
On 12/9/06, Rich Kulawiec <
[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:50:57AM -0500, David Hester wrote:
> CNN recently reported that 90% of all email on the internet is spam.
CNN is behind the times. We passed 90% junk (spam, viruses, bogus virus
warnings, worms, outscatter spam, C/R spam, etc.) a few years ago.
Locally, over the last three months, we've been rejecting > 98% of incoming
traffic with just two reported problems from internal and external users.
And almost all of that rejected traffic TCP-fingerprints as originating
from hosts running Windows.