North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

problem with BGP or I am an Idiot

  • From: Philip Lavine
  • Date: Fri Nov 17 09:46:31 2006
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wYl5w+IWTwZ6WrnmKF1D1jUJNicX4MH6J5k+t7PLDvEBWy77GRTnn1dYvLsFU4yvJTRK7MXoiUljgs/wFkbG7btnEJbhS3OJG32hA9Wxio+GYSYdXhjFuVVnh/4ZfBID7zJ2PieuYOsF5A2+KeNPRkMg/lOxHGWonoysILNSAiw= ;
To all,

Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the Internet via the same ISP_A. I am using the same AS for both routes. 

For some reason on my rtr advertising the 2.2.2.2 rte I am unable to see the 1.1.1.1 rte "% Network not in table". I know 1.1.1.1 rte is valid it shows up in looking glass and ISP_A has it on the peer 2.2.2.2 recevies full Internet rtes from. Further verification: I add a static rte on 2.2.2.2 rtr to 1.1.1.1 and its routable???

How is this possible? I have the following filters but I removed them and it seems to not make a diff.
OUTBOUND - ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$
                     ip as-path access-list 1 deny .*
INBOUND - ip as-path access-list 2 permit .*


Philip
  



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link

$420k for $1,399/mo. 
Think You Pay Too Much For Your Mortgage? 
Find Out! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre